Occasional Paper 3
THE
QUR’AN AND THE SUNNAH:
THE
TIME-SPACE FACTOR
Taha Jabir Alwani
Imad Aldin Khalil
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ISLAMIC THOUGHT
Published 1991 by IIIT
International Institute of Islamic Thought
Headquarters:
555 Grove Street
Herndon, VA 22070, USA
London Office:
P.O. Box 126
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 2UD, UK
©IIIT
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Al ‘Alwani, Taha Jabir
The Qur’an and the Sunnah: the Time-Space
Factor
I. Tittle II. Al Din Khalil,
Imad
297.1226
ISBN0-912463-91-0
Occasional Papers Series’ Editors
Dr A S al Shaikh-Ali
Rashid Messaoudi
Design by Zafar ‘Abbas Malik
Printed in the USA by
International Graphics
4411 41st Street
Brentwood, Maryland, 20722
CONTENTS
The Occasional Papers Series … 1
Introduction … 3
The Qur’an: The Primary Source of Knowledge
Dr Taha Jabir Al Alwani … 5
Toward a Proper Reading of the Sunnah
Dr Taha Jabir Al Alwani … 27
The Qur’an and Modern Science: Observations on Methodology
Dr ‘lmad al Din Khalil … 39
Notes … 54
About the Authors … 57
The Occasional Papers Series
The publication program of the International Institute of Islamic Thought
(IIIT) has already addressed important issues in the field of Islamic thought
and the Islamization of knowledge. In this respect a number of books have
already appeared in several languages under eleven main series: Dissertations;
Human Development; Islamic Methodology; lslamization of Culture; Islamization
of Knowledge; Issues in Contemporary Islamic Thought; Lectures; Occasional Papers; Perspectives on Islamic Thought; Research Monographs; and
Studies in the Islamization of Knowledge.
The Occasional Papers series, published by the
Institute's London Office, covers a number of research papers, articles, and
lectures from the Institute’s world-wide program as well as from Muslim
scholars willing to make contributions. These are presented individually in the
form of booklets that can be easily read or referred to. It is hoped that the
booklets will reach students, scholars, and specialists as well as major
sections of the world’s Muslims alike in order to generate a fruitful debate on
the vital issue of Islamization, to create an awareness of the intellectual
crisis in its various shapes and forms, and to encourage an active role in the
proposed course of action and solution. This series is also translated into
other languages.
The third work in this series, The Qur'an
and the Sunnah: The Time-Space Factor includes three papers originally
written in Arabic-“The Qur‘an: The Primary Source of Knowledge”; "Toward a
Proper Reading of the Sunnah", which is an adaptation of Dr al ‘Alwani's
introduction to Dr Yusuf al Qaradawi’s Kayfa Nata’amal Ma’a al Sunnah al
Nabawiyyah (Methods of Understanding the Sunnah) and “The Qur‘an and Modern
Science: Observations on Methodology". A different English edition of the
latter appeared in The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences, Vol. 8, No.
1, March 1991. The English editions of the three papers were prepared by the
Department of Translation/IIIT. We also acknowledge the contribution of Huda
Khatab and Yusuf Budd.
The use of Islamic terminology in
transliteration is a policy of the IIIT. Some of the terms used are
untranslatable,
Pg.1
while others are so important that the Institute felt that
familiarity with them is necessary for a better understanding of Islamic
issues. These terms have been endnoted once or sometimes explained briefly
between brackets. All those which have not yet been accepted in English
dictionaries are in italic. As many of these occur more than once, the readers
are advised to refer to the endnotes whenever necessary. Moreover word emphasis
in bold is the initiative of the editors.
The translation of the Qur’an used in this series is that of Yusuf
Ali (Amana Corporation, revised, 1989). However we made changes to it whenever
we deemed it necessary for the sake of elucidation and precision of meaning.
IIIT, London
1412/1991
Pg.2
Introduction
For too long now, the Qur’an and the Sunnah,
great sources of strength, purity, knowledge and inspiration for the Ummah,
have not been adequately tapped. Skirting their peripheries or over- dwelling
on one or two of their multifarious facets and tributaries has done a
disservice to the immense potential of the fountain-head, while denying the
Ummah—indeed the whole world—innumerable benefits from them.
Now that the Ummah is increasingly becoming
aware of its own problems as well as latent powers, and yearns to revive its
leading role in the forging of history and civilization, the issue of drawing on
the well-spring becomes more relevant and urgent. Revisiting these two sources
is no longer a scholastic, academic, nostalgic, or escapist indulgence, but a
great journey of discovery that promises untold rewards.
And like all great journeys of discovery, this
one too may be beset by many challenges and possible setbacks. But once the
will has steeled itself to the task ahead, and the Great Guide and light of all
travelers has bestowed His blessings and grace, there should be no going back
empty-handed, empty-souled.
The rewards are indeed immeasurable: the better
discernment of human potential and God‘s plan; the recovery of a balanced, active,
and purposeful life; the restoration of dignity, of peace and harmony, not only
to the Ummah, but also to the world at large —a world that has suffered long
from bogus ideologies and precepts. Paradoxically, the journey through the
resplendent pages of the Qur'an and the Sunnah to a time and place in the past
should yield a more mature awareness of the dynamics of social and historical
change and of man‘s role on earth, honing and sharpening the Muslims’ capacity to
deal with the demands of the present moment and the challenges of the future.
The human and relative dimensions involved in the quest should bring us closer
to our fellow-Muslims and human beings, but also, at a higher plane—indeed, the
highest—nearer to the Creator of all life and all endeavors.
Pg.3
In the first paper of this book, Dr Taha Jabir
al ‘Alwani explains how the Qur’an—revealed and protected from corruption by
Allah (SWT) —is a source of knowledge. A source which reveals its benefits only
if read properly. Dr al ‘Alwani argues that there are two levels of reading the
Qur'an; the first level consists in cultivating spiritual upliftment; the
second one urges man, as vicegerent, to study the cosmos for the purpose of
positive action on earth. Performing the two readings together and keeping a
balance between them are prerequisites for well-being in this world and in the
hereafter.
Earlier
generations focused essentially on the formal aspects of the Qur'an and the
hereafter and the Revelation came to be seen only as a source of fiqh and
legislation. Such restrictive reading of the Qur'an curbed for long the
enthusiasm to investigate its validity in time and space. This is why Dr al
‘Alwani advocates the need for a new approach that tackles the comprehension of
the Qur'an in a holistic way.
Similarly,
a proper reading of the Sunnah—the subject of Dr al ‘Alwani’s second paper—will
be conducive to a better understanding of the aims of Muhammad’s prophethood
and, accordingly, to a rational implementation of the spirit of his Sunnah, in
accordance with those sensible requirements of the time we live in and of the space
we belong to.
For his part Dr ‘Imad al Din Khalil tackles the relation
between the Qur'an and science, arguing that the Qur’an is not a science
textbook, but that science-oriented data abound in it in the form of outright scientific
facts or pointers. In his view, the Qur'an expounds a flexible and
comprehensive methodology for dealing with these science-oriented data—a
methodology that is not subject to the fluctuations of time and space and
remains valid in every age and environment.
Suggestions for a new reading
of the Qur’an and the Sunnah have been put forward from Islamic and other
angles in the recent years. In this book Dr al ‘Alwani and Dr Khalil, two
well-known Muslim thinkers, put forward their views for a proper approach to
these sources from within the Islamic framework.
The Editors
Pg.4
THE
QURAN: THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF KNOWLEDGE
Dr. Taha
Jabir al‘Alwani
Islam, the Final Message, is
a statement of mercy, light, guidance and healing for all creatures: “We sent
you not, but as a mercy for all created beings” (Qur'an 21:107). This Message
and its Book, the Qur'an, will always guide humanity and remain inviolate
against distortion and deviation. Allah (SWT)1 has assured
that
لَّا يَأۡتِيهِ ٱلۡبَـٰطِلُ مِنۢ بَيۡنِ
يَدَيۡهِ وَلَا مِنۡ خَلۡفِهِۦۖ تَنزِيلٌ۬ مِّنۡ حَكِيمٍ حَمِيدٍ۬ (٤٢) سُوۡرَةُ حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت
“No falsehood can
approach it from before or behind it. It is sent down by One Full of Wisdom, Worthy
of all Praise (41:42).
The Qur’an is the Book of Allah the Eternal, and was
revealed to mankind through Muhammad (SAAS)2, the Seal of the
prophets, to be an admonition to all beings. Indeed there is no prophet after Muhammad
(SAAS), nor any revelation after the Qur'an.
There was a succession of
prophetic missions in the times before Muhammad (SAAS). Every nation was sent
its own special messenger to address it in its own tongue and in the manner
befitting it. Invariably, prophets responded to man‘s needs in the way that was
most appropriate to man:
إِنَّآ أَرۡسَلۡنَـٰكَ بِٱلۡحَقِّ بَشِيرً۬ا
وَنَذِيرً۬اۚ وَإِن مِّنۡ أُمَّةٍ إِلَّا خَلَا فِيہَا نَذِيرٌ۬ (٢٤) سُوۡرَةُ فَاطِر
And there never was a people without a warner
having lived among them [in the past] (35:24).
وَمَآ أَرۡسَلۡنَا مِن رَّسُولٍ إِلَّا
بِلِسَانِ قَوۡمِهِۦ لِيُبَيِّنَ لَهُمۡۖ فَيُضِلُّ ٱللَّهُ مَن يَشَآءُ
وَيَهۡدِى مَن يَشَآءُۚ وَهُوَ ٱلۡعَزِيزُ ٱلۡحَكِيمُ (٤) سُوۡرَةُ إبراهیم
We sent not a messenger except [to teach] in
the language of his [own] people, in order to make [things] clear to them (14:4).
The earlier prophetic missions were accompanied by cosmic
signs and physical miracles which aimed to astound man and induce him to accept
the message. One prophet, for example, would raise a mountain above his
people’s heads to shade them, divide the sea so that people could walk along a
dry passage between its two halves, cast his stick and it would change into a
serpent, or put his hand in his pocket then draw it out and it would be white but
unharmed. Another prophet was sent a wondrous she-camel as a sign and a symbol.
A third prophet would bring the dead to life and heal the blind and the leper.
And when the people rejected their prophets after seeing the signs and
miracles, they were afflicted by punishment and ruination. However, Allah (SWT)
has honored the Muslim Ummah and preserved it from doom and destruction.
Pg.6
When the pagans of Makkah asked the Prophet (SAAS) to
cause springs to gush forth for them, or mount a ladder right into the skies, or
have a house adorned with gold, while condemning him for being human, God did
not respond to their demands:
وَقَالُواْ مَالِ هَـٰذَا ٱلرَّسُولِ يَأۡڪُلُ
ٱلطَّعَامَ وَيَمۡشِى فِى ٱلۡأَسۡوَاقِۙ لَوۡلَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيۡهِ مَلَكٌ۬
فَيَكُونَ مَعَهُ ۥ نَذِيرًا (٧) أَوۡ يُلۡقَىٰٓ إِلَيۡهِ ڪَنزٌ أَوۡ
تَكُونُ لَهُ ۥ جَنَّةٌ۬ يَأۡڪُلُ مِنۡهَاۚ وَقَالَ ٱلظَّـٰلِمُونَ إِن
تَتَّبِعُونَ إِلَّا رَجُلاً۬ مَّسۡحُورًا (٨) سُوۡرَةُ الفُرقان
And they say: “What sort of a messenger is
this, who eats food and walks through the streets? Why has not an angel been
sent down to him to give admonition with him?"
or “[why] has not a treasure been bestowed on him", or “why has he [not] a
garden for enjoyment?" The wicked
say: “You follow non other than a man bewitched" (25: 7-8).
وَلَقَدۡ صَرَّفۡنَا لِلنَّاسِ
فِى هَـٰذَا ٱلۡقُرۡءَانِ مِن كُلِّ مَثَلٍ۬ فَأَبَىٰٓ أَكۡثَرُ ٱلنَّاسِ إِلَّا
ڪُفُورً۬ا (٨٩) وَقَالُواْ لَن
نُّؤۡمِنَ لَكَ حَتَّىٰ تَفۡجُرَ لَنَا مِنَ ٱلۡأَرۡضِ يَنۢبُوعًا (٩٠) أَوۡ تَكُونَ لَكَ جَنَّةٌ۬ مِّن
نَّخِيلٍ۬ وَعِنَبٍ۬ فَتُفَجِّرَ ٱلۡأَنۡهَـٰرَ خِلَـٰلَهَا تَفۡجِيرًا (٩١) أَوۡ تُسۡقِطَ ٱلسَّمَآءَ كَمَا
زَعَمۡتَ عَلَيۡنَا كِسَفًا أَوۡ تَأۡتِىَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلۡمَلَـٰٓٮِٕڪَةِ قَبِيلاً
(٩٢) أَوۡ يَكُونَ لَكَ بَيۡتٌ۬
مِّن زُخۡرُفٍ أَوۡ تَرۡقَىٰ فِى ٱلسَّمَآءِ وَلَن نُّؤۡمِنَ لِرُقِيِّكَ حَتَّىٰ
تُنَزِّلَ عَلَيۡنَا كِتَـٰبً۬ا نَّقۡرَؤُهُ ۥۗ قُلۡ سُبۡحَانَ رَبِّى هَلۡ
كُنتُ إِلَّا بَشَرً۬ا رَّسُولاً۬ (٩٣) وَمَا
مَنَعَ ٱلنَّاسَ أَن يُؤۡمِنُوٓاْ إِذۡ جَآءَهُمُ ٱلۡهُدَىٰٓ إِلَّآ أَن
قَالُوٓاْ أَبَعَثَ ٱللَّهُ بَشَرً۬ا رَّسُولاً۬ (٩٤) سُوۡرَةُ بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء
And We have explained to man, in this Qur’an, every kind of
similitude: yet the greater part of men
refuse [to receive it] except with ingratitude! They say: "We shall not
believe in you, until you cause a spring to gush forth for us from the earth.
Or [until] you have a garden of date trees and vines, and cause rivers to gush
forth in their midst, carrying abundant water. Or you cause the sky to fall in pieces, as you say [will happen] against us;
or you bring Allah and the angels before [us] face to face. Or you have a house
adorned with gold, or you mount a ladder right into the skies. No, we shall not
even believe in your mounting until you send down to us a book that we could
read." Say: “Glory to my Lord! Am I aught but a man—a messenger? “What
kept men back from belief when Guidance came to them was nothing but this—they
said, “Has Allah sent a man [like us] to be [His] messenger?" (17: 89-94),
In the
same surah (al Isra’) Allah (SWT) demonstrates His wisdom in not
responding to the pagans’ demands:
وَمَا مَنَعَنَآ أَن نُّرۡسِلَ بِٱلۡأَيَـٰتِ إِلَّآ أَن ڪَذَّبَ بِہَا ٱلۡأَوَّلُونَۚ وَءَاتَيۡنَا ثَمُودَ ٱلنَّاقَةَ مُبۡصِرَةً۬ فَظَلَمُواْ بِہَاۚ وَمَا نُرۡسِلُ بِٱلۡأَيَـٰتِ إِلَّا تَخۡوِيفً۬ا (٥٩) سُوۡرَةُ بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء
And We refrain from sending the Signs, only
because the men of former generations treated them as false .We sent the she-camel
to the Thamud to open their eyes, but they treated her wrongfully. We
only send the Signs as warnings [from evil] (17:59).
God also
makes it clear to Muhammad (SAAS) that the pagans’ rejection of the message is
not the result of a lack of clear signs and miracles but has been influenced by
other factors. The Pharaoh of Egypt and his people were shown indubitable signs
and miracles through Prophet Musa (AS)3 yet they responded in
the same way as the pagans of Makkah:
Pg.7
وَلَقَدۡ ءَاتَيۡنَا مُوسَىٰ تِسۡعَ ءَايَـٰتِۭ
بَيِّنَـٰتٍ۬ۖ فَسۡـَٔلۡ بَنِىٓ إِسۡرَٲٓءِيلَ إِذۡ جَآءَهُمۡ فَقَالَ
لَهُ ۥ فِرۡعَوۡنُ إِنِّى لَأَظُنُّكَ يَـٰمُوسَىٰ مَسۡحُورً۬ا (١٠١) سُوۡرَةُ بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء
To Musa we did give clear signs. Ask the
Children of Israel: When he came to them, Pharaoh said to him: “O Musa, I consider you, indeed, to have been
worked upon by sorcery” (17:101).
And
Allah (SWT) continued to Prophet Muhammad (SAAS) that the message did not need
a prophet other than him, nor a sign and a Book other than the Qur‘an:
وَلَقَدۡ صَرَّفۡنَـٰهُ بَيۡنَہُمۡ
لِيَذَّكَّرُواْ فَأَبَىٰٓ أَڪۡثَرُ ٱلنَّاسِ إِلَّا ڪُفُورً۬ا (٥٠) وَلَوۡ
شِئۡنَا لَبَعَثۡنَا فِى ڪُلِّ قَرۡيَةٍ۬ نَّذِيرً۬ا (٥١) فَلَا تُطِعِ
ٱلۡڪَـٰفِرِينَ وَجَـٰهِدۡهُم بِهِۦ جِهَادً۬ا ڪَبِيرً۬ا (٥٢) سُوۡرَةُ الفُرقان
And We have distributed the [water] amongst
them, in order that they may celebrate [Our] praises, but most men are averse [to
aught] but [rank] ingratitude; If We so wished, We could have sent a warner to
every center of population. Therefore listen not to the unbelievers, but strive
against them with the utmost strenuousness, with the [Qur'an] (25: 50-52).
This
Final Message sought to convince people by asking them to read, listen to and
understand the Qur’an so that they can believe its message. This would be enough
to achieve the desired transformation in the hearts and minds of those who are
willing to listen earnestly and witness the Truth. However, the response of the
diehards was one of characteristic arrogance and shallowness:
وَقَالُواْ لَوۡلَآ أُنزِلَ عَلَيۡهِ
ءَايَـٰتٌ۬ مِّن رَّبِّهِۦۖ قُلۡ إِنَّمَا ٱلۡأَيَـٰتُ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ وَإِنَّمَآ
أَنَا۟ نَذِيرٌ۬ مُّبِينٌ (٥٠) أَوَلَمۡ يَكۡفِهِمۡ أَنَّآ أَنزَلۡنَا
عَلَيۡكَ ٱلۡڪِتَـٰبَ يُتۡلَىٰ عَلَيۡهِمۡۚ إِنَّ فِى ذَٲلِكَ لَرَحۡمَةً۬
وَذِڪۡرَىٰ لِقَوۡمٍ۬ يُؤۡمِنُونَ (٥١) سُوۡرَةُ العَنکبوت
Yet they say: “Why are not signs sent down to
him from his Lord?" Say: “The signs are indeed with Allah; and I am indeed
a clear Warner." And is it not enough for them that We have sent down to
you the Book which is rehearsed to them? Verily, in it is Mercy and a Reminder
to those who believe (29: 50-51).
In His wisdom Allah (SWT) has
made reading the pivot of this Ummah’s life. The first word revealed to
Muhammad (SAAS) by the archangel Jibril was Iqra’(read), to which the
unlettered Prophet replied: “I cannot read". Then the angel gave him
Allah’s command:
ٱقۡرَأۡ بِٱسۡمِ رَبِّكَ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ (١) خَلَقَ
ٱلۡإِنسَـٰنَ مِنۡ عَلَقٍ (٢) ٱقۡرَأۡ وَرَبُّكَ ٱلۡأَكۡرَمُ (٣) ٱلَّذِى
عَلَّمَ بِٱلۡقَلَمِ (٤) عَلَّمَ ٱلۡإِنسَـٰنَ مَا لَمۡ يَعۡلَمۡ (٥) سُوۡرَةُ العَلق
Read in the name of your Lord Who created;
Created man out of a [mere] clot of congealed blood. Read! And your Lord is
Most Bountiful. He Who taught [the use of] the pen. Taught man that which he
knew not (96: 1-5).
Pg.8
The above ayat4 which began the
process whereby the Prophet (SAAS) received Revelation, contain two commands
each of which has both a Divine and a human aspect. The first command is to
read, i.e. to receive, understand and proclaim the Revealed Message. In this
command the Divine aspect is manifest in the sense that the Qur'an is the Word
and Revelation of Allah (SWT) and that it is for Him to reveal it to His
Prophet (SAAS) so that it can be communicated in complete and accessible form
to man who is expected to reflect, remember, understand and continuously learn:
فَتَعَـٰلَى ٱللَّهُ ٱلۡمَلِكُ ٱلۡحَقُّۗ وَلَا
تَعۡجَلۡ بِٱلۡقُرۡءَانِ مِن قَبۡلِ أَن يُقۡضَىٰٓ إِلَيۡكَ وَحۡيُهُ ۥۖ
وَقُل رَّبِّ زِدۡنِى عِلۡمً۬ا (١١٤) سُوۡرَةُ طٰه
Be not in haste with the Qur'an before its
revelation to you is completed, but say: “O my Lord! Advance me in
knowledge" (20:114).
وَلَقَدۡ يَسَّرۡنَا ٱلۡقُرۡءَانَ لِلذِّكۡرِ
فَهَلۡ مِن مُّدَّكِرٍ۬ (١٧) سُوۡرَةُ القَمَر
And We have indeed made the Our’an easy to
understand and remember. Then is there any that will receive admonition? (54:17).
لَا تُحَرِّكۡ بِهِۦ لِسَانَكَ لِتَعۡجَلَ
بِهِۦۤ (١٦) إِنَّ عَلَيۡنَا جَمۡعَهُ ۥ وَقُرۡءَانَهُ ۥ (١٧) سُوۡرَةُ القِیَامَة
Move not your tongue concerning [the Qur’an] to
make haste therewith. It is for Us to collect it and to promulgate it (75: 16-17).
Thus it is for Allah (SWT) to
reveal, send down, collect and safeguard, and for humankind to read, learn and
teach so that souls can become purified and cleansed. Only then will they
become qualified to fulfill their appointed roles as vicegerents and apply the
tools put at their disposal for the purpose of building civilization and
producing the finest peoples ever evolved for mankind:
هُوَ ٱلَّذِى بَعَثَ فِى ٱلۡأُمِّيِّـۧنَ
رَسُولاً۬ مِّنۡہُمۡ يَتۡلُواْ عَلَيۡہِمۡ ءَايَـٰتِهِۦ وَيُزَكِّيہِمۡ
وَيُعَلِّمُهُمُ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ وَٱلۡحِكۡمَةَ وَإِن كَانُواْ مِن قَبۡلُ لَفِى
ضَلَـٰلٍ۬ مُّبِينٍ۬ (٢) سُوۡرَةُ الجُمُعَة
It is He Who has sent amongst the unlettered an
apostle from among themselves, to rehearse to them His signs (62:2).
The second exhortation to
read urges humankind to study the cosmos and decipher its affinities and its
multifarious components, all ruled by Allah (SWT) and intimating His Oneness.
Indeed the Divine aspect is evident in all creation, including the creation of
man himself: “[Who] created man out of a [mere] clot of congealed blood” (96:2).
The relationships and stages from the clot to man, and between life and death,
have their equivalents in all the other signs of the Divine Power at work in the
ordered universe.
Pg.9
The
purpose behind them all is to prepare man to acquire learning and promote civilization.
This is clear evidence of the Mercy of Allah (SWT), whose glory is declared by
all voices and tongues: "There is not a thing but that celebrates His praise"
(17:44). Another purpose is the realization of the aim of existence and the
wisdom of creation:
۞ وَإِلَىٰ ثَمُودَ أَخَاهُمۡ صَـٰلِحً۬اۚ قَالَ يَـٰقَوۡمِ
ٱعۡبُدُواْ ٱللَّهَ مَا لَكُم مِّنۡ إِلَـٰهٍ غَيۡرُهُ ۥۖ هُوَ أَنشَأَكُم
مِّنَ ٱلۡأَرۡضِ وَٱسۡتَعۡمَرَكُمۡ فِيہَا فَٱسۡتَغۡفِرُوهُ ثُمَّ تُوبُوٓاْ
إِلَيۡهِۚ إِنَّ رَبِّى قَرِيبٌ۬ مُّجِيبٌ۬ (٦١) سُوۡرَةُ هُود
He it is Who has produced you from the earth and settled you therein ( 11: 61).
He it is Who has produced you from the earth and settled you therein ( 11: 61).
وَمَا خَلَقۡتُ ٱلۡجِنَّ وَٱلۡإِنسَ إِلَّا
لِيَعۡبُدُونِ (٥٦) سُوۡرَةُ الذّاریَات
I have only created jinn and men that
they may worship me (51:56).
The two readings
are interconnected and must occur simultaneously and be in the name of Allah
(SWT). Moreover, their interconnection will create a correspondence between
Allah (SWT) and man and ensures that He accompanies him in his endeavor as vicegerent
and in the Hereafter: “And He is with you wheresoever you may be" (57:4),
Allah (SWT) is too Bountiful to leave man alone in either of the two situations.
Rather, He guides man through his reading:
ٱقۡرَأۡ وَرَبُّكَ ٱلۡأَكۡرَمُ (٣) ٱلَّذِى عَلَّمَ بِٱلۡقَلَمِ (٤) عَلَّمَ ٱلۡإِنسَـٰنَ مَا لَمۡ يَعۡلَمۡ (٥) سُوۡرَةُ العَلق
Read! And your Lord is Most Bountiful, He Who
taught the use of the pen, taught man that which he knew not (96: 3-5).
He knows man's weakness, the limits of his potential, the paucity of
his knowledge and the relativism of his thought:
أَلَا يَعۡلَمُ مَنۡ خَلَقَ وَهُوَ ٱللَّطِيفُ
ٱلۡخَبِيرُ (١٤) سُوۡرَةُ المُلک
Should He not know — He that created? And He is
the One that understands the finest mysteries [and is] well acquainted with
them (67-14).
يُرِيدُ ٱللَّهُ أَن يُخَفِّفَ عَنكُمۡۚ
وَخُلِقَ ٱلۡإِنسَـٰنُ ضَعِيفً۬ا (٢٨) سُوۡرَةُ النِّسَاء
For man was created weak [in flesh] (4:28).
وَيَسۡـَٔلُونَكَ عَنِ ٱلرُّوحِۖ قُلِ ٱلرُّوحُ
مِنۡ أَمۡرِ رَبِّى وَمَآ أُوتِيتُم مِّنَ ٱلۡعِلۡمِ إِلَّا قَلِيلاً۬ (٨٥) سُوۡرَةُ بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء
Of knowledge it is only a little that is
communicated to you, [o men] (17:85).
Thus
Allah (SWT) taught Adam (AS) all the names, He taught with the pen and He
taught man that which he did not know, in order to enable him to fulfill the
first reading. And He made everything subject to him, ordered him to travel
through the earth, provided him with all the necessary faculties for observation,
contemplation and understanding and disposed the signs for him so that he may undertake
the second reading.
Pg.10
Performing
the two readings together is a prerequisite for well-being in this world and in
the next. Abandoning or neglecting either of the two readings—or upsetting the
balance between them—is a turning away from the Message of Allah (SWT). The
unfortunate consequences of such an attitude are such as to render this life
difficult and hard to live and the Hereafter abode of dire constraint:
وَمَنۡ أَعۡرَضَ عَن ذِڪۡرِى فَإِنَّ
لَهُ ۥ مَعِيشَةً۬ ضَنكً۬ا وَنَحۡشُرُهُ ۥ يَوۡمَ ٱلۡقِيَـٰمَةِ
أَعۡمَىٰ (١٢٤) سُوۡرَةُ طٰه
But whosoever turns away from My Message,
verily for him is a life narrowed down, and We shall raise him up blind on the Day
of Judgment. (20:124).
In such
a situation, man will thus be dethroned from his position as vicegerent and
witness and placed in a state of subjection and disgrace:
إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يُدۡخِلُ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ
وَعَمِلُواْ ٱلصَّـٰلِحَـٰتِ جَنَّـٰتٍ۬ تَجۡرِى مِن تَحۡتِہَا ٱلۡأَنۡہَـٰرُۖ
وَٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ يَتَمَتَّعُونَ وَيَأۡكُلُونَ كَمَا تَأۡكُلُ ٱلۡأَنۡعَـٰمُ
وَٱلنَّارُ مَثۡوً۬ى لَّهُمۡ (١٢) سُوۡرَةُ محَمَّد
While those who reject God will enjoy [this
world] and eat as cattle eat; and the Fire will be their abode (47:12).
وَلَقَدۡ ذَرَأۡنَا لِجَهَنَّمَ ڪَثِيرً۬ا مِّنَ
ٱلۡجِنِّ وَٱلۡإِنسِۖ لَهُمۡ قُلُوبٌ۬ لَّا يَفۡقَهُونَ بِہَا وَلَهُمۡ أَعۡيُنٌ۬
لَّا يُبۡصِرُونَ بِہَا وَلَهُمۡ ءَاذَانٌ۬ لَّا يَسۡمَعُونَ بِہَآۚ
أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ كَٱلۡأَنۡعَـٰمِ بَلۡ هُمۡ أَضَلُّۚ أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ هُمُ
ٱلۡغَـٰفِلُونَ (١٧٩) سُوۡرَةُ الاٴعرَاف
They are like cattle, nay more misguided: for
they are heedless [of warning] (7:179).
Excessive preoccupation with
the first reading without paying sufficient attention to the second may result
in the reader acquiring a mass of interpretations and reflections which may
well be highly beneficial to his perceptions and feelings. At the same time, however,
it can lead to a sort of spiritual coma and an absorption in matters unrelated
to the needs and functions of his vicegerency and civilizing role, This may be
tolerable, even understandable, in a limited, personal context, but it is extremely
perilous if it occurs at the broader level of the Ummah or becomes accepted as
part of her way of life, since this will lead to the neglect and rejection of
the idea of the value of human action. This in turn will lead a person to adopt
a distorted view of the meaning of life and the meaning and role of man in his
worldly existence—to the extent that he may come to see his very existence here
on earth as a burden and strive to be relieved of it with the utmost dispatch,
so that he can proceed to the Hereafter.
SOME QURANIC FEATURES
The Qur‘an was revealed in
separate installments. Most of these were connected with specific situations
and events, in order to prepare people's hearts, minds and souls to accept,
understand and meditate on it at the time of its revelation.
Pg.11
People would then be able to
understand it and fix its words, meanings, guidelines and directives
permanently in their consciousness. Then their hearts would be opened to
receive it, their minds would comprehend it and their souls would be uplifted
by it. The whole of life would respond to it and be transformed into one of
contentment and rectitude. The Qur‘an could thus be a guide, a proof and an
authoritative source to the first generation and all later generations:
وَقَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ لَوۡلَا نُزِّلَ
عَلَيۡهِ ٱلۡقُرۡءَانُ جُمۡلَةً۬ وَٲحِدَةً۬ۚ ڪَذَٲلِكَ لِنُثَبِّتَ بِهِۦ
فُؤَادَكَۖ وَرَتَّلۡنَـٰهُ تَرۡتِيلاً۬ (٣٢) سُوۡرَةُ الفُرقان
‘[They] say: "Why is
not the Qur‘an revealed to him all at once? [It is revealed] in this manner
that We may strengthen your heart thereby, and we have rehearsed it to you in
slow, well-arranged stages, gradually (25:32).
وَقُرۡءَانً۬ا فَرَقۡنَـٰهُ لِتَقۡرَأَهُ ۥ
عَلَى ٱلنَّاسِ عَلَىٰ مُكۡثٍ۬ وَنَزَّلۡنَـٰهُ تَنزِيلاً۬ (١٠٦) سُوۡرَةُ بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء
[It is] a Qur‘an which We
have divided [into parts from time to time], in order that you might recite it
to men at intervals: We have revealed it by stages (17:106).
The
Qur’an was revealed as a challenge and a miracle that would overwhelm people‘s
hearts and cause their souls to marvel, thus paving the way for them to accept
the message and respond to it with all their being.
The
Qur’an contains basic conceptions and general rules, guidance and advice valid
for all human beings in every place and time and every realm of life. If it had
dealt with minor details and issues relevant to the period of Revelation, it
would not have acquired this unique quality of time-space universality, and
later generations would have found in it a great deal of contradictions and
inconsistency. The specific issues that are dealt with in fine details are essentially
the same objectives and rules applicable in every time-space situation and
relate to ‘ibada (worship), inheritance and histories of earlier peoples
and nations. And the Creator (SWT) pledged to safeguard the Qur’an when He
said:
إِنَّا نَحۡنُ نَزَّلۡنَا
ٱلذِّكۡرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُ ۥ لَحَـٰفِظُونَ (٩) سُوۡرَةُ الحِجر
We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will
assuredly guard it [from corruption] (15:9).
The purpose behind the command
to preserve the Qur‘an in its original language (and the prohibition on
transmitting it in Arabic according to meaning or by paraphrase) was to ensure
that the Book remained able to establish the way of life that Allah (SWT)
wished for mankind.
Pg.12
There is profound wisdom in
the fact that millions of Muslims read and recite it in its exact original
words and in the form that it was revealed, since this enables it to remain the
foundation on which all Muslims agree at all times and in all places—however much
their paths and inclinations might diverge. Hence the Prophet (SAAS) and the
leading fuqaha'5 who followed him were determined that
every letter of the Qur‘an should be first fixed in men‘s minds and hearts, and
then transcribed. This same wisdom may have been behind the many traditions
from the companions of the Prophet (SAAS) reported by the tabi’un (the
generation after the Companions) which prohibited the transcription of anything
other than (or with) the Qur’an. All other things are related to it in a
practical application—and understanding at the highest level—of its teachings.
This is a situation that has never occurred with any other text-religious or
otherwise.
As to
the meanings of the Qur‘an, the Prophet (SAAS) had the knowledge to give tafsir
(exegesis) of every ayah. However, he did not do so. It is narrated
that ‘Aisha (RAA) said: “The Prophet of Allah only gave interpretations of a
few ayah from the Qur‘an, which were taught to him by Jibril." These
ayah deal with matters related to al ghayb (the Unseen), together
with some other questions that can only be understood through Revelation. Consequently
schools of tafsir proliferated and over the centuries Muslim intellects
roamed through the Qur‘an along many different routes. Some were successful,
others were not. Concerning the Prophet’s Companions who witnessed the Revelation
while it was being sent down and knew the reasons for revealing, abrogating and
abrogated6 ayat as well as the factors linking the ayat
to real events, so much has been said that Imam al Ghazali and Imam al Qurtubi
remarked:
It would be incorrect to assume that everything
said about tafsir by the Companions actually came from the Prophet
(SAAS) for two reasons. One is that it is only established that the Prophet
(SAAS) gave tafsir of a few ayat …. This was also ‘Aisha’s view.
The other is that they themselves differ in their tafsir on various
points that cannot be reconciled and cannot all have come from the Prophet of
Allah (SAAS) —even though some may have done so7.
Implied
here is the contention that the intellect should not be constrained by a
limited understanding of the Qur‘an that “imprisons” its meanings in a
particular period or tie it to a given generation.
Pg.13
Indeed,
one of the most effective ways of bringing a Muslim nearer to his Lord is for
him to read the Qur’an and contemplate constantly on its ayat and their
meanings. Conversely, reading or contemplation without understanding is not
permissible. The fuqaha are agreed that understanding and contemplation
with little reading is better than much recitation without thinking or
contemplation. And by contemplation we mean here reciting the ayah,
reviewing it, dwelling on its meanings in an attempt to know all the possible
meanings it contains, and allowing one’s thought to wander freely and unhampered
through it in order to arrive at the hidden meanings that Allah (SWT) reveals
to certain people of intellect and understanding.
As a
heavenly Revelation, the Qur’an is the most reliable source for all kinds of
knowledge and an authentic guide for scholars in the humanities and social
sciences. It contains general scientific pointers and indicators that awaken
and guide man’s scientific instincts. Unfortunately, however, many Muslims have
long been under the impression that the Qur‘an is primarily a source for the
past history of nations whose stories were told for the purposes of admonition and
warning, in addition to being a repository of information about the Hereafter
and its Unseen aspects as well as a fount of fiqh8 rulings.
Moreover,
they have only concentrated on its miraculous quality as being the
inimitability of its poetic language, style, and literary elegance,
representing the highest possible peak that the Arabic language is capable of
attaining—a brilliant treatment of language in a manner previously unknown in
Arabic style, while remaining within the bounds of expression permitted by the
Arabic language. Indeed studies of the Qur`an’s miraculous qualities by the
earlier generations were almost confined to these three aspects, as works by al
Rumani, al Baqillani, al Jurjani, al Qadi Ayyad and other scholars show. The
Qur‘an came to be seen only as a source of fiqh and legislation, which
restricted it to between 200 and 500 ayat only. The rest were regarded
as solely for the purpose of admonition and warning as well as edification.
However, such restrictions, in addition to confining the miracle of the Qur’an
purely to the level of rhetoric, curbs the enthusiasm to seek those aspects
that are renewable and applicable for every time and place, and which testify
to the Qur'an’s miraculous nature.
Since we
are seeking the path to a decent, contemporary Islamic life, to bring about a
revival of Islam, we must be aware that the fiqh rulings only account for
a very small part of the area covered by the Qur‘an.
Pg.14
We must further realize that
Muslims need to use their intellect to understand and meditate on all the ayat
of the Qur‘an, making it the primary source and basis of all knowledge in
the areas of human fitrah (innate nature) and of social and applied sciences.
Indeed, every Muslim with specialist qualifications in any field of knowledge
must turn to the Qur‘an for inspiration and guidance. A conscious and contemplative
reading of the Book of Allah will enable him to amend, add to and reshape his
store of knowledge. This will enable Muslims ho rebuild the true Ummah of the
Qur‘an. However, before we can reach this stage we must first achieve a number
of things:
To begin with studies on the
miraculous nature of the Qur'an need to be reviewed, seeking additional characteristics
that the modern Muslim can add to those aspects of the Qur‘an that are commonly
regarded as miraculous. Areas of particular interest may include the effect of
the Qur‘an on human fitrah, its ability to create the finest form of
human being and the finest form of family in any time or place, and its effect
on society and the establishment of nations. Muslim psychologists and
sociologists would find this a profitable area to investigate. Likewise, Muslim
applied scientists and other scholars can find valuable material in the Qur‘an.
Muslim thinkers and ulama can investigate its miraculous nature in areas
of ahkam (rulings) and legislation capable of forming a sound basis for
a decent human life, as well as systems that are just, easy to understand and practically
applicable.
In the second stage the aims behind
reading and interpreting the Qur'au need to be reconsidered. This should go
beyond the three aims of acquiring knowledge about earlier peoples and nations,
the Hereafter and fiqh rulings. There are indeed also other essential aims,
the most important of which may be:
1. To obtain general guidance in human
affairs and the sciences that deal with individual and social behavior as well
as with fitrah.
2. To acquire knowledge of the basic rules
and guidelines for reforming society as well as its political system-in a
manner consistent with its view of both human and social nature-and to endeavor
to discover how this can be achieved.
Pg.15
We can classify all the social sciences under
these two aims. Thus the Qur‘an becomes the reliable reference and moral
yardstick for all types of scientists and scholars, a reference whose contents
will never become outdated. Specialists in the social and applied sciences,
literature, etc...will find it a valuable source to consult on a daily basis.
This means that a Muslim must treat the Qur’an differently from the way he does
at present, that is merely a book that he reads when he wishes to acquire
Allah‘s blessing or find out about certain rulings.
Here we must tackle an important questions
regarding two forms of interpretation: al tafsir bi al ma'thur (exegesis
by means of traditions received from the Prophet and his companions) and al
tafsir bi al ra'i (exegesis by means of free exercise of the mind). This
issue deserves attention because today‘s ulama and scholars will not
find most of the time practices and traditions from the Prophet (SAAS) and the
early Companions to support their conclusions and interpretations. Thus their
pronouncements will be based on nothing more substantial than personal opinion.
Now the question is: how can al tafsir bi al ra'i be resorted to when
there exist ahadith9 that clearly prohibit
interpreting the Qur‘an on the basis of personal opinion. Indeed, many of the
Companions and the tabiun would abstain from making interpretative
pronouncements unless these were supported by the Sunnah. How, then, should we
expect a contemporary committed Muslim researcher in any discipline today to apply
his/her reason to interpret the ayah of the Qur‘an? Although this is a
big and delicate question, its answer will become clear if one notes the following:
We have stated that there is a limited volume
of al tafsir bi al ma'thur from
the Prophet (SAAS). Wisdom would therefore seem to suggest that the Muslim
intellect should be allowed to continue with its efforts of contemplation,
reflection and deductions in order to understand the ayat of the Qur‘an.
Numerous books of interpretation have appeared throughout
the ages and interpreters have adopted a wide variety of approaches in their deductions
of the meanings of the Our’an — in the ayat
containing rulings as well as others. Fakhr al din al Razi (d. 606 AH) stated that
if he wished to produce a camel-load of interpretations on Surat al Fatihah
he would be able to do so. In fact, his tafsir of this surah that has
come down to us comprises one large volume.
Pg.16
Many ulama like Ibn ‘Atiyyah, al
Qurtubi, Ibn al Sabbagh and others—could have deduced a meaning from an ayah
or build tens even hundreds—of issues for examination on it. In such cases the new
issues raised and examined issues related to cosmic laws, civilization
patterns, etc… which make the Qur‘an unique among other revelations—would not have
been mentioned earlier or explained by the Prophet (SAAS) himself.
Nevertheless, other 'ulama and exegetes did not reject this approach to
the Qur’an as long as the right conditions for exegesis were met. Under these
conditions, interpretation, in the words of al Tayyibi
should be in conformity with the actual words
[of the text] and be free from artificiality, affectation, verbosity and
prolixity10.
Therefore the interpretation that was
considered bid‘a (unacceptable innovation) —in the sense intended by the
narrated ahadith prohibiting interpretation by personal opinion—could
belong to one of the following categories:
1. Interpretation based on personal opinion
without a serious consideration for the genius of the Arabic language, its
styles, the aims of the Shari‘ah, the question of abrogating and abrogated ayat
and without due attention to the reasons underlying the revelation of a
specific ayah or ayat. This kind of casual interpretation is pure
guesswork and contributes nothing to the advancement of Truth.
2. Interpretation which involves thought and
contemplation, but of a defective kind because of failure by the aspiring
interpreter to take into account all the factors connected to the ayah .
In this case the exegete draws his conclusions from the apparent meaning of the
words—or even an aspect of this meaning—and taken this to be the only meaning
intended.
3. The last category is when the interpreter
is a follower of a particular school of thought, schism or tendency which
causes him to interpret certain ayat of the Qur‘an to suit the views of his trend without
taking linguistic meanings and/or the circumstances of revelation into
consideration, For example the Bayaniah group interpret the ayah
“this is a bayan [a plain statement] to men” (31:138) as referring to
their leader Bayan bin Sam‘an al Timimi who was killed in 119 AH. The Qadyaniyah
interpret “giving glad tidings of an apostle to come after me, whose name shall
be Ahmad” (61:6) as referring to Ghulam Ahmad Qadyani.
Pg.17
The Batiniya claim that the Qur‘an has
an outward and a hidden meaning, the outward meaning being the one understood
by Muslims, while the hidden one provides support for their own collected
superstitions derived from bygone philosophies, ancient religious beliefs, or
the delusions of their various leaders. To prevent anyone from refuting them they
attribute all their nonsensical claims to “hidden meanings” in the Qur'an.
Leading scholars of the Ummah have nevertheless been able to refute this
tendency and expose its evil aims.
Then there exist what are called “signs” —also
known today as “symbolism". For example an ayah might be understood
as having a symbolic meaning, that is representing something that does not spring
immediately to mind and which is not directly conveyed by the language. For
example consider the following:
وَمَنۡ أَظۡلَمُ مِمَّن مَّنَعَ مَسَـٰجِدَ
ٱللَّهِ أَن يُذۡكَرَ فِيہَا ٱسۡمُهُ ۥ وَسَعَىٰ فِى خَرَابِهَآۚ
أُوْلَـٰٓٮِٕكَ مَا كَانَ لَهُمۡ أَن يَدۡخُلُوهَآ إِلَّا خَآٮِٕفِينَۚ لَهُمۡ
فِى ٱلدُّنۡيَا خِزۡىٌ۬ وَلَهُمۡ فِى ٱلۡأَخِرَةِ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ۬ (١١٤) سُوۡرَةُ البَقَرَة
And who is more unjust than he who forbids that
in the masajid [places for worship usually meaning ‘mosques‘]of Allah, Allah’s
name should be celebrated? —whose zeal is [in fact] to ruin them? (2:114)
Here some may claim that masajid might
be interpreted as meaning "hearts" since hearts are the locations of
subjection to Allah (SWT). This is a kind of interpretation by opinion in which
the meaning is totally unsupported by linguistic factors.
However, there are three methods of
interpretation which may be considered acceptable:
First: Restricting
it to the understanding of the obvious meanings of the words.
Second: Deducing
concepts implied by the obvious meanings of the words. These would be arrived
at by capable interpreters after careful thinking, and would be based on
linguistic considerations in conjunction with usage and would not be estranged
from the aims and purpose of the Qur‘an.
Third: When
the interpreter makes use of the intellectual, scientific and cultural
resources of his own time and applies them to the ayat to see how
compatible they are with the pointers of the Qur‘an. He can then decide how
these disciplines can be rectified in the light of the meanings indicated in
the ayah:
Pg.18
يُؤۡتِى ٱلۡحِڪۡمَةَ مَن يَشَآءُۚ وَمَن
يُؤۡتَ ٱلۡحِڪۡمَةَ فَقَدۡ أُوتِىَ خَيۡرً۬ا ڪَثِيرً۬اۗ وَمَا يَذَّڪَّرُ إِلَّآ
أُوْلُواْ ٱلۡأَلۡبَـٰبِ (٢٦٩) سُوۡرَةُ البَقَرَة
“And he to whom wisdom is
grained receives indeed a benefit overflowing; but none will grasp the Message
but men of understanding” (2:269).
When a modern Muslim economist considers the
words of Allah (SWT): “In order that it may not make a circuit between the
wealthy among you" (59:7), and then puts forward an idea never previously raised
by Muslim scholars regarding the formation and distribution of wealth, and the
way in which this can best be done for the public good, he should not be
opposed on the grounds that his statement has never been made before and does
not have the backing of Hadith. However, the usuliyun11
would maintain that it is not permissible to deduce a meaning outside the
original (hence asli) comprehension of the Arabs at the time of
revelation. Their position, too, is based on much thought but is open for
discussion.
Al Shatibi, the author of Al Muwafaqat says:
When something from the “illiterate’s
Shari’ah" (ummiyat al shariah) [designed for and can be understood by
illiterate people] is accepted as applying to its people—the Arabs that is—rules
are built on it. One consequence of this is that many people have gone too far
in invoking the Qur'an in that they have extended its scope to include all the
natural sciences, known to contemporary and earlier generations in addition to linguistics,
logic, semantics etc. But this does not tally with earlier practices. The
venerable forefathers were the best versed in the Qur‘an, its sciences and
contents; yet they were never heard to pronounce on anything apart from proven commandments
and precepts related to the Hereafter. Yes, the Qur'an encompasses sciences
which the Arabs knew and were familiar with, though in a manner which astounds
men of understanding and cannot be grasped by the more powerful intellects.12
Al Shatibi’s remarks are based on the
assumption that the Qur'an is no more than a source of legislation and that it
is a Message to an illiterate nation—the Arabs. Hence Qur'anic concepts and style
are determined by the Arabs own ability to understand. Many people consider
this attitude to be one of this venerable usuli‘s most serious errors
since the Qur'an was revealed as a Book of Guidance to the whole world in every
time and place. The Arabic language, with its breadth and richness, is an apt
vehicle for carrying its meanings. This does not mean, however, that the Arab
mind is the sole authority on all these meanings—linguistic or otherwise.
Pg.19
In addition, the Qur'an contains much that the
Arabs did not previously know or understand and which would not be possible to list
in such a short study. Allah says:
تِلۡكَ مِنۡ أَنۢبَآءِ ٱلۡغَيۡبِ نُوحِيہَآ
إِلَيۡكَۖ مَا كُنتَ تَعۡلَمُهَآ أَنتَ وَلَا قَوۡمُكَ مِن قَبۡلِ هَـٰذَاۖ
فَٱصۡبِرۡۖ إِنَّ ٱلۡعَـٰقِبَةَ لِلۡمُتَّقِينَ (٤٩) سُوۡرَةُ هُود
Such are the stories of the Unseen, which We
have revealed unto thee: Before this, neither you nor your people knew them
(11:49).
The Arabs at the time of revelation were
addressed in a way that they were able to understand. Later, understanding
broadened and new circumstances and influences revealed in the text a number of
additional meanings which were not constrained by language limitations. This,
in fact, is an important aspect of the Qur‘an‘s miraculous nature; that is,
that through the ages a single text—properly understood and containing the same
words and letters—should be able to respond to different needs. A hadith
narrated by al Tirmidhi on the authority of ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib (RA) states:
“The wonders of the Qur'an never cease." To say that it is not permissible
to go beyond the linguistic meanings conveyed by the text is tantamount to
asserting that the Our`an’s wonders are finite and thus bound by time and
space. The fact that the forebears did not mention a particular thing with
regard to certain ayah or ayat does not mean that it is forbidden
to interpret them; this simply means that their interpretation focused on areas
in which they were experts and in which interpretation was needed. It clearly
does not mean that others are forbidden to explore areas that they themselves
did not explore.
The statements and assertions on this issue
point to the fact that the relationship between the Qur‘an and the different
sciences exist at different levels:
1. There are sciences which are taken from
the Qur‘an. These included tawhid13, tashir (legislation) and usul (sources of jurisprudence).
2. Other sciences that are dependent on it.
This is the case of language sciences and balaghah (rhetoric).
3. There exist sciences indicated in it,
which help in understanding it and increasing faith in it. This category would
include many of the humanities and social sciences as well as some astronomical
and applied sciences.
Pg.20
4. Finally, there are sciences that bear no
relation to it whatsoever. It is imperative, therefore, that energies be
galvanized to reform the methodologies of Islamic thought and rebuild the
Islamic cultural system through the establishment of up-to-date Islamic social
sciences and humanities. Throughout, the aim should be to find the best possible
way of relating such disciplines to the Qur‘an and the Sunnah14
of the Prophet (SAAS) in accordance with a specific plan that could be based on
four principles.
The first and most important of these principles
should be to restore the Qur’an to the Islamic cultural scene, end the division
between it and the Muslim mind and make it the contemporary Muslim’s prime source
of knowledge— just as it was in the past when our ancestors used to consult it
to obtain sound, precise knowledge about life, man, and human institutions.
The second principle should be to
establish a methodology for understanding the Prophet’s Sunnah and using it to
build a modern Islamic culture and civilization.
The third consists in drawing on the Islamic
legacy by applying sound methodologies for understanding it, using it to build
our modern culture and learning the necessary lessons from it.
The fourth principle is to address
contemporary Arab thought by examining ways of understanding, using and
benefiting from it.
The strategy to adopt should give appropriate
priority to methodologies for understanding and applying the Qur‘an. In the course
of this task, a Qur’an File will need to be created to concentrate on
research and studies in:-
1.
Ways of understanding the Qur’an and making it the modern Muslim‘s
primary source of culture, knowledge, science and guidance.
2.
Issues related to tafsir, ta’wil (interpretation of
implied meanings), classification and indexing of the Our’an, its relationship
to the earlier and moden Muslim sciences and the latter’s affiliation to it.
Pg.21
3.
Other issues which aim to (a) restore the Muslim intellect‘s
ability to apply the Qur‘an in a sound manner and (b) reinstate the Qur‘an to
its rightful position at the center of modern Muslim culture, knowledge and
civilization. Then the Muslim intellect will be reformed and the Qur‘an will
reassume its role of enlightening it.
The envisaged Qur'an File has been
inaugurated by Shaykh Muhammad al Ghazali's book Kayfa Nata 'amal ma‘a al
Qur'an15 to be followed by seminars and other studies
covering the different aspects of the subject.
Denoting a new awareness, the book endeavors to
bring the Qur'an into the realistic context of a changing world. Of course, no
one should labor under the supposition that the book—one in a series of studies
and papers which seek to correct a great many misconceptions about ways of
approaching the Qur‘an and Islamic subjects—answers all the questions and
presents solutions to all the problems. Yet, it is the first step towards
establishing a modern Islamic methodological awareness. The thrust should be towards
reviewing and evaluating our Islamic legacy from its human perspective.
This study, as well as future works on the
subject, does not seek to produce a break with the prevailing inherited elements
of Islamic thought. On the contrary, they accept those parts of the legacy that
can be authenticated and respond positively to all Islamic trends and schools
of thought, particularly those that developed before the ages of decadence,
backwardness and intellectual stagnation.
This should work towards satisfying the Islamic
obligation of making the Qur'an more accessible to intelligent, rational-minded
people. The book consists of a number of critical introductions-reflecting the
number of different subjects covered-whereas the questions and answers attempt
to establish a Qur’anic awareness consistent with the principles of a
methodology that does not blindly accept every prevailing notion without
criticism or analysis.
Already the Qur‘an is a source from which
scholars have been able to add to their own specialist fields of knowledge.
Equally, it has provided the basis for their comprehension of the world, while
their ways of applying it have varied according to the historical development of
human thought. A person who reads the Qur'an as an organic whole differs from
the selective reader who isolates individual ayat from their respective
contexts.
Pg.22
Similarly, a person who regards it as a
collection of stories, laws, inducements and threats differs from the reader
who sees it as a comprehensive encyclopedia covering cosmic and dynamic
existence, the means through which he can acquire an objective perception of the
universe, its movements and its relationships across the continuous, ever-changing
spectrum of time and space.
The Qur‘an defines its own specific qualities
and explains that it embodies a complete Revelation which responds to all
situations throughout all the ages—past, present and future:
وَٱلَّذِىٓ أَوۡحَيۡنَآ إِلَيۡكَ مِنَ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبِ
هُوَ ٱلۡحَقُّ مُصَدِّقً۬ا لِّمَا بَيۡنَ يَدَيۡهِۗ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ بِعِبَادِهِۦ
لَخَبِيرُۢ بَصِيرٌ۬ (٣١) ثُمَّ أَوۡرَثۡنَا ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ ٱلَّذِينَ
ٱصۡطَفَيۡنَا مِنۡ عِبَادِنَاۖ فَمِنۡهُمۡ ظَالِمٌ۬ لِّنَفۡسِهِۦ وَمِنۡہُم
مُّقۡتَصِدٌ۬ وَمِنۡہُمۡ سَابِقُۢ بِٱلۡخَيۡرَٲتِ بِإِذۡنِ ٱللَّهِۚ ذَٲلِكَ هُوَ
ٱلۡفَضۡلُ ٱلۡڪَبِيرُ (٣٢) سُوۡرَةُ فَاطِر
That which We have revealed to thee of the Book
is the Truth, confirming what was [revealed] before it: for Allah is assuredly—with
respect to His servants—Well Acquainted and Fully Observant. Then We have given
the Book for inheritance to such of Our servants as We have chosen: but there
are among them some who wrong their own souls; some who follow a middle course;
and some who are, by Allah’s leave, foremost in good deeds; that is the highest
Grace (35: 31-32).
These ayat clearly show that the Qur‘an
constantly responds to the situations and needs that arise over the ages in a
self-renewing process:
۞ فَلَآ أُقۡسِمُ بِمَوَٲقِعِ ٱلنُّجُومِ (٧٥) وَإِنَّهُ ۥ
لَقَسَمٌ۬ لَّوۡ تَعۡلَمُونَ عَظِيمٌ (٧٦) إِنَّهُ ۥ لَقُرۡءَانٌ۬
كَرِيمٌ۬ (٧٧) فِى كِتَـٰبٍ۬ مَّكۡنُونٍ۬ (٧٨) لَّا
يَمَسُّهُ ۥۤ إِلَّا ٱلۡمُطَهَّرُونَ (٧٩) سُوۡرَةُ الواقِعَة
Furthermore I call to witness the setting of
the Stars. And that is indeed a mighty adjuration if you but knew. That this is
indeed a Qur‘an most honorable. In a Book well-guarded. Which none shall touch
but those who are clean (56: 75-79).
The Qur'an, through which Allah (SWT) has
related stories of our forefathers, has another unique quality: it is
infallible and a sacrosanct Divine book:
إِنَّا نَحۡنُ نَزَّلۡنَا ٱلذِّكۡرَ وَإِنَّا
لَهُ ۥ لَحَـٰفِظُونَ (٩) سُوۡرَةُ الحِجر
We have, without doubt, sent down the Message;
and We will assuredly guard it [from corruption] (15:9).
It is thus an authoritative record for future
generations to whose affairs it will be relevant:
وَمَآ أَرۡسَلۡنَا مِن قَبۡلِكَ إِلَّا
رِجَالاً۬ نُّوحِىٓ إِلَيۡہِمۡۚ فَسۡـَٔلُوٓاْ أَهۡلَ ٱلذِّكۡرِ إِن كُنتُمۡ لَا
تَعۡلَمُونَ (٤٣) بِٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ وَٱلزُّبُرِۗ وَأَنزَلۡنَآ إِلَيۡكَ
ٱلذِّڪۡرَ لِتُبَيِّنَ لِلنَّاسِ مَا نُزِّلَ إِلَيۡہِمۡ وَلَعَلَّهُمۡ
يَتَفَكَّرُونَ (٤٤) سُوۡرَةُ النّحل
And before you also the apostles We sent were
but men, to whom We granted inspiration. If you realize this not, ask of those
who possess the message. [We sent them] with clear signs and Books; and We have
sent down up to you [also] the Message; that you may explain clearly to men
what is sent for them, and that they may give thought (16: 43-44).
Pg.23
It is a Book that holds sway against the
distortions and corruptions of the earlier books:
وَلَقَدۡ ءَاتَيۡنَا مُوسَى ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ
فَٱخۡتُلِفَ فِيهِۗ وَلَوۡلَا ڪَلِمَةٌ۬ سَبَقَتۡ مِن رَّبِّكَ لَقُضِىَ
بَيۡنَهُمۡۚ وَإِنَّهُمۡ لَفِى شَكٍّ۬ مِّنۡهُ مُرِيبٍ۬ (٤٥) سُوۡرَةُ حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت
We certainly gave Musa the book aforetime; but
disputes arose therein. Had it not been for a Word that went forth before from
your Lord, [their differences] would have been settled between them; but they
remained in suspicious disquieting doubt thereon (41:45).
Furthermore, the Qur'an has many other qualities.
We can discern them in its organic, methodological unity, particularly after
the Book was arranged so that the sequence of its ayat was no longer dictated
by the period of revelation (a time when they were fragmented and limited by
the specific occasions on which they were revealed). These qualities can also
be discerned in the fact that the Qur'an is divinely preserved, and that it
renews its contribution to human affairs by uncovering its treasures according
to the requirements of time: it is the master of time, place and change since
it provides a total awareness of the universe, its movements and its relationships.
It also contains an awareness of the whole of existence, including knowledge of
the words of Allah (SWT). Hence the past, the present, and the future
generations are not in any way capable of attaining a comprehensive
understanding of the Revelation. Instead, they each take from it as required by
the civilizational, social and historical conditions as well as the modes of thinking
of their own time.
The importance of Shaikh al Ghazali’s book is
not in providing a new interpretation but in its attempt to free contemporary Islamic
thought from a multitude of deficiencies and shortcomings before directing it
towards the pursuit of knowledge and sound methodology. This is to be achieved
in an Islamic society which we do not claim has already absorbed all the new
changes and developments that are taking place in the world, but which has
begun to do so. In any case, the concept of universalism in thought and aim is an
Islamic quality.
Pg.24
It was Islam that established the first
world-wide religious movement when it described the Prophet (SAAS) as the Seal
of the prophets and the Qur'an as the Seal and Master of the Divine books.
Moreover, by extending its realm from the Atlantic ocean in the West to the
Indian ocean in the East, Islamic civilization became the first civilization to
overcome the dichotomy between East and West and unite civilizations and races
across the central part of the ancient world.
Universalism is deeply ingrained in our Islamic
structure; hence it is incumbent upon us to consider the crises of world
civilization and the solution offered by Islam, with a methodological awareness
which puts the achievements of contemporary human thought into a single context
and demonstrates Islam`s supremacy over the whole of man’s history, despite the
fact that the text of the Qur‘an has never been altered or modernized.
Here it is worthwhile to touch upon the requirements
of a contemporary methodological awareness. The latter cannot be
achieved by simply belonging to a certain age or time while neglecting or
ignoring the physical surroundings. Growth and development are not just the accumulation
of contemporary achievements and the grafting of large numbers of the latest
innovations to the structure of the old social system, but are a qualitative
change in a society’s economic, social and ideational structure. This requires
a new approach to the Qur'an and a fresh awareness to meet the new reality. The
concept of a contemporary society does not mean the continuation of the old society
and its thought in the context of future times. On the contrary, it refers to
the historical changes that a society must have undergone in order to qualify
for the designation contemporary. These changes will enable society to rediscover
itself, which for us also means rediscovering the Qur‘an within the framework
of this changing world.
Considered from this angle it will be clear
that many of our Arab and Islamic societies see themselves as contemporary in
the sense that they are here in the present time. However, they do not actually
live in a contemporary situation; they do not possess the present worldwide
cultural awareness with its critical, analytical mentality and its aspirations
to acquire methodical knowledge and solve today‘s problems. Arab and Islamic
societies have a tendency to cling to their past and their traditional thought
while concurrently existing in the modern international age. This dichotomy has
given them a feeling of contemporaneity combined with an inability to respond
to the situation that would enable them to attain contemporary universal
awareness.
Pg.25
Hence we find that some intellectual leaders in
these societies are still producing material based on traditional thought and
are attempting to recreate the past within the present without exploring the
nature of world historical and social change. They are content to develop the
themes of our righteous forebears (RAA) in terms of the ijtihad16
that the latter practised in their age and applied to their issues. At the same
time, such intellectual leaders ignore the historical difference between the
two periods and fail to see the need for ijtihad in and for modern age, Instead
of being models of ijtihad, the righteous forebears have become models
to be imitated.
We need to break this mould, and attempt to
identify the historical developments that have obstructed the advancement of fiqh
in its wide sense which covers political and constitutional laws as well as that
of economic and international relations. We need to define the way in which
these historical developments have affected the positions of the a‘immah17
and their commitment to the branches of
fiqh as al muhaddithun18 were committed to
the Sunnah issues in matters related to hadith transmission and sanad.19
Such historical overview may help restore fiqh
to its rightful position from which history has excluded it, while exposing the
conflicts—such as the dichotomy between the authority and the ulama,
fiqh and Sufism as well as between those who studied the Qur'an without any reference
to the Sunnah and those who studied the Sunnah without any reference to the
Our’an, Such conflicts should not have occurred under the Islamic system since
there already exists—by Allah's grace—a single focal point for all the Ummah’s
Islamic activities and trends, namely one supreme, contradiction-free Qur’an.
This should make possible a meeting of Divine Will and human effort for the
Qur‘an to assume fully its role of creating a complete and balanced civilization
whose benefits will be shared by Muslims and all beings:
وَيَوۡمَ نَبۡعَثُ فِى كُلِّ أُمَّةٍ۬ شَهِيدًا
عَلَيۡهِم مِّنۡ أَنفُسِہِمۡۖ وَجِئۡنَا بِكَ شَہِيدًا عَلَىٰ هَـٰٓؤُلَآءِۚ
وَنَزَّلۡنَا عَلَيۡكَ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ تِبۡيَـٰنً۬ا لِّكُلِّ شَىۡءٍ۬ وَهُدً۬ى
وَرَحۡمَةً۬ وَبُشۡرَىٰ لِلۡمُسۡلِمِينَ (٨٩) سُوۡرَةُ النّحل
And We have sent down to you the Book
explaining all things, a Guide, a Mercy and glad tidings [to believers] (16:89).
Pg.26
-------------------------------------------------------
TOWARD A PROPER READING OF THE SUNNAH
Dr. Taha Jabir Alwani
From the beginning of Islam, the Sunnah has
been invoked and interpreted in accordance with a framework of rules known to scholars
and mujtahidun20. Its authority has been second to
that of the Qur’an. In fact both are inseparable as the Sunnah explains and
clarifies the Qur'an and—most importantly—applies its teachings and
methodology.
Hence the authority of the Sunnah is an
essential part of Islam—a fact never disputed by any of the early Muslims.
Among later generations, however, there were people with little knowledge and understanding
who could not differentiate between the Prophet‘s Sunnah as preserved in
authentic and reliable ahadith, and chronicles and anecdotes about
earlier times. They did not know to what extent such historical or anecdotal
reports could be regarded as authoritative; how valuable they were as a means
of increasing man’s knowledge; or whether they were still to be regarded as
authoritative even when they were contradicted by rational thought or tangible
evidence. These ill-informed people imagined that the discussion of this methodological
and philosophical matter was a dispute concerning the Sunnah itself. They considered
the sunan (norms and practices) to be related accounts, and the accounts
to be mere reports and, therefore, most of the dispute centered on the reports.
They failed to see the tremendous difference between the Sunnah as examples and
guidelines set by the Prophet (SAAS), and the ways in which it was transmitted.
Furthermore, they did not see the differences between the methods of reporting
the Prophet’s actions, deeds, and sayings on the one hand and the reporting
about other people, on the other. The result of this lamentable confusion is
that the dispute turned into one concerning the authority of the Sunnah itself—a
contention which occupied inordinate space in books devoted to the studies of
usul and Hadith. The energy so used could have been invested in the study
of the correct methodology for understanding the Sunnah, interpreting it and
deriving lessons from it, thus enabling Muslims in every place and age to
organize their thinking and way of life on the basis of its teachings.
Those unnecessary and deliberate quibbles
regarding the authority of the reports in general—and of ahad21
in particular— had other negative, very serious and damaging effects: they
deepened the differences and polemics between Muslims, and cast their shadow on
research and Islamic studies in this field, which reduced many works to
abstract discussions that had no positive, intellectual or practical impact.
Pg.28
Controversies, like those concerning the status
Sunnah in relation to the Qur'an and the Sunnah’s abrogation of the latter and
vice versa raged on to involve Muslims in unnecessary lengthy and repetitive
criticism and checking over the authenticity of historical reports, narrators
and chains of authority. If one were to look at the limited number of works
devoted to the methodologies of studying, analyzing and understanding the
texts, and of presenting the ahadith in relation to time-space,
environment and reality, then compare them to the stupendous efforts and
numerous volumes devoted to the study of asanid, one would realize the
origin and nature of subsequent problems and confusion.
Likewise, a great deal of energy went into producing
undoubtedly valuable works in the field of legislation. Such works could have met
the Ummah’s needs more adequately had they covered all aspects of the Sunnah
and not dealt only with the legislative aspects.
Because the Sunnah as a whole represents the
stage of guidance through the implementation of the Qur’an‘s methodology in a historical
and geographical context characterized by particular ideological, economic and
social circumstances, the study of methodologies of understanding the Sunnah is
considered to be one of the most important and necessary aspects of the studies
of usul and Hadith. This was the
period when Islam was comprehensively put into practice, when the Qur'an itself
played a leading role in translating the ideals of Islam into reality and in
making this period of history an era which posterity could refer to and strive
to emulate. Thus, the Sunnah represents the highest, most precise, best and truest
form of implementing Allah's message. It is a realistic, learned, and
all-rounded embodiment of the Qur‘an’s methodology. This was probably behind
the Creator’s wisdom to preserve the Qur'an in the form in which it was
revealed and safeguard it against any corruption. The Prophet (SAAS) himself
showed a strong determination to preserve every single letter of the Qur‘an and
adhere to every single one of its vowels and pauses. Hence the continuous warning
that every letter of the Qur’an should be transmitted in the form in which it
was revealed, and the prohibition that any ayat should be transmitted in
a paraphrased form.
This was not the case with the Sunnah. Although
the Sunnah was preserved, the above restrictions were not imposed on it. Moreover,
the Prophet (SAAS) did not have it written down as was the case with the
Qur’an. Nor did he review it with Jibril as he reviewed the Qur‘an with him.
Pg.29
The reason for this difference of approach was
to enable the Sunnah to remain a practical experience at the highest level of
human capability as practised by the Prophet (SAAS) who responded to the Qur'an
in a comprehensive and all-embracing manner. Indeed he applied and embodied its
methodology in all daily life matters and worldly activity: when preaching,
teaching, making changes around him, prohibiting, enjoining, advising,
counseling, guiding, judging, giving fatawa22, instructing,
disciplining, fighting, peacemaking, concluding treaties, selling, buying,
exchanging messages, marrying, divorcing, building, demolishing, travelling . .
.
The Quran’s methodology followed and monitored
the Prophet‘s actions. Many of its ayat
evaluated the manner in which this methodology was applied, and—when
necessary—criticized, analyzed, corrected and directed it. This was because the
application process is bound and conditioned by human limitations as well as by
the time-space factor. Hence Allah said: "Remain, then, as conscious of
Allah as you can".
When a person other than the Prophet (SAAS)
applies the Quran’s methodology, there is a greater need for the application to
be evaluated in comparison with the Prophet‘s own application of it because
people other than the Prophet (SAAS) himself are more susceptible to subjective
personal impulse and spontaneous influences. Thus, in the case of worship, for
instance, people used to follow the Prophet’s example only. They were required
to follow his example rather than imitate him, because following an example is
a conscious activity involving the intellect, which requires a general awareness
of all factors surrounding the example to be followed.
The International Institute of Islamic Thought
has always considered the understanding of the Sunnah, its comprehensive,
exhaustive analysis and the proper approach to using it as a source of Islamic knowledge
and culture to be among the most important matters of concern to Muslim
scholars today. This is especially so since defining and explaining the bases
and sources of Islam—as well as methods of understanding them—are among the
fundamental prerequisites for the reconstruction of the Ummah’s knowledge,
culture and civilization. To achieve this goal, the Institute decided to
undertake several actions:
Pg.30
Firstly, it aimed to shift the focus of usul
and hadith studies from matters which have already been conclusively dealt
with to matters which are still unresolved and in need of solutions. In this
respect the Institute considers the question of the authority of the Sunnah to have
been conclusively dealt with as no Muslim who believes in Allah and His
Messenger can afford to deny this authority. The Institute has published Hujjiyat
al Sunnah (The legal Authoritativeness of the Sunnah) by the leading
contemporary usul specialist shaikh ‘Abd al Ghani Abd al Khaliq. It is a
valuable academic study on this subject, one of the most important and comprehensive
works in the field, and one which the Institute regards as thefinal word on the
matter.
In the meantime, the Institute has endeavored
to draw the attention of researchers in this field to the use of information
technology in making the Sunnah more accessible to scholars and researchers in various
subjects. The Institute has already lent its support to many scholars working
towards this aim.
Furthermore, the Institute concerned itself
with the classification of the Sunnah according to subject, and using any appropriate
scientific methodologies likely to help us to achieve our aim of making the Sunnah
a source of knowledge in the social sciences, instead of it being a source
limited to fiqh alone.
Finally, the Institute initiated action to
invite prominent scholars to write works concerning various aspects of the
Sunnah and its major role in reconstructing Islamic civilization. Eminent
scholar Shaikh Muhammad al Ghazali already made a well-received contribution: Al
Sunnah Bayna Ahl al Fiqh wa Ahl al Hadith (The Sunnah between Fiqh Experts
and Hadith Specialists)23. The book suggests methods of
understanding the Sunnah and shows the differences between those who are
concerned with the structure of the asanid and reports, and those whose
interest lies in understanding the Sunnah and deriving lessons from it. This distinguished
scholar is, in the opinion of the Institute, too experienced and knowledgeable
for anyone to dictate to him how to write or to check his books publication.
However, much criticism was made about some of the details he gave and examples
he used in his book; so much so that the main message of the book was almost
drowned by the clamour about these minor details.
The book was aimed primarily at those people
who do not have a basic knowledge of Shari’ah and research methodology, and
whose knowledge of history, sirah24, fiqh and Arabic
is not adequate enough to enable them to understand the hadith correctly.
Pg.31
Many people do come across hadith literature
and read through it without understanding its nature or the reasons behind the
Prophet's words or deeds reported in it, or without grasping the general
context of the ahadith. Their
understanding is therefore deficient and confused, and leads them to develop
and adopt a distorted knowledge of hadith which they pass on to people at
large. Such people go as far as claiming that the Sunnah takes precedence over
the Our’an and can abrogate it. Moreover, if they are confronted with more
authentic ahadith which contradict the ones they invoke in their argument,
they do not understand the nature of the contradiction, the ways of evaluating such
ahadith or even the correct
methods and rules of understanding the ahadith put before them.
The book was also aimed at scholars and
researchers involved in the study of the Sunnah, advising them to devote at
least some of their attention to proper methods of understanding it; for there
is no Sunnah without proper understanding, and there can be no fiqh, Islamic civilization
or true knowledge without Sunnah. When the Institute became aware of the
confusion surrounding the message of Shaikh al Ghazali’s book, it requested Dr
Yusuf al Qaradawi to prepare two detailed books, one on the methods of understanding
the Sunnah and the other on the Sunnah as a source of knowledge. The
first has already been published by the Institute under the title: Kayfa Nata’amal
Maa’ al Sunnah al Nabawiyyah (Methods
of Understanding the Sunnah); and the second will come out in the future—in
sha’ Allah25.
In the endeavor to restore the Sunnah to its
positive and active role in shaping contemporary Islamic life, the greatest
need seems to be for Islamic higher education to include the methodological
approach to the Sunnah in their syllabi of hadith studies, instead of teaching topics
which have already been dealt with conclusively.
It is hoped that Muslims will increasingly take
a greater interest in understanding the Sunnah. They need to attain and
disseminate a better appreciation of the rules and conditions of such
understanding, and to develop a keen interest in knowing the reasons why misunderstanding
over the Sunnah has arisen. They need to understand why overlapping issues have
led to a crisis in understanding and how this crisis helped to involve
scholastic theology in the debate on the authority of the Sunnah.
Pg.32
Three questions require in-depth research if a
comprehensive, methodological approach to the understanding of the Sunnah is to
be established:
a)
The Conditions for Understanding.
If the problem with the Sunnah is a question of
understanding it correctly, then what are the factors of differences and
confusion over it at different times in history? What are the qualities and
qualifications required for its proper study and understanding? Is commitment
to Islam a prerequisite for understanding? How can one overcome one’s lack of
comprehensive insight? How can we deal with the crisis decisively and conclusively?
How can we resolve the question of overlapping issues, which generated
confusion and which, in tum, in the opinion of many researchers, led to the
debate on the authority of part—if not all—of the Sunnah? A debate which became
an excuse for arguments and bragging, although Islamic history shows this had
never been an issue among earlier Muslims!
b)
Differences and Divisions.
How and why did the Ummah become divided into
different sects and groups? How have differences in the interpretation,
understanding and transmission of the Sunnah and over its authority contributed
to the emergence of these various groups? How has the Sunnah been used as a
weapon between the various Islamic sects and groups? How did the phenomena of
hadith fabrication, of incomplete understanding and of the use of the Sunnah
for deriving legislation only arise? What effect did these phenomena have on
the emergence of various groups and what is their connection with the
appearance of specialized technical questions in the study of ahadith
and analysis of their chains of narrators? How did all these matters become involved
in Sunnah studies discussed earlier by usul scholars and scholastic
theologians? Such matters include the authority of the Sunnah, its status in
relation to the Qur’an, its abrogation of certain ayat , its explanation
and delimitation of a general statement in the Qur'an, the Prophet’s ijtihad,
the argument over it as well as the appraisal of the ‘spoken Sunnah’ and
certain passages of the Qur‘an dealing with many of these issues.
What effect have these phenomena had on the
Muslim mind from the intellectual and educational points of view? What is the
historical contexts which brought about these issues? What is their
intellectual significance, and what impact have they had hitherto?
Pg.33
What are the best ways to deal with them in
modern Sunnah studies and to draw up syllabi for such studies? How can lessons
be drawn from these issues so as to attain the best vision likely to unite the
Muslims and to motivate the Ummah to rebuild its civilization?
c)
The Time-Space Factor in Understanding the Sunnah.
The usuliyun, like the first generation
of Muslims, recognized the particular historical and geographical context of
the Prophet's deeds and words, the human nature of his experience. They, therefore,
set rules for taking these factors into account. Is it possible for the
specialists to draw up some guidelines to help others take these factors into
account when reading various types of ahadith? In that case, what is the
procedure to be followed and the role of modern Hadith studies in defining
these guidelines?
Knowledge of the essential differences between
the minor matters dealt with by the faqih, the intellectual matters
dealt with by the thinker, the philosopher and the mutakallim
(scholastic theologian) on the one hand, and the social phenomena dealt with by
the social scientist on the other hand, requires a variety of ways as well as a
range of methodologies for understanding and dealing with the Sunnah. A hadith
dealing with a minor issue which is part of the faqih’s field is different from
a hadith dealing with a general social phenomenon the interpretation of which
must take into account all the aspects of that phenomenon which the social
scientist would examine in his analysis of it. How can we rid ourselves of the
chronic division of the Ummah which misuses the same hadith to support opposing
ideas and how to do away with the fanatical adherence of each group to its own
beliefs? How can we restore the bases of a holistic view of Islamic thought and
thus escape from this vicious circle, especially now that it has become easier to
collect the Sunnah and invite scholars to carry out academic research, hold
debates and establish joint institutions for this purpose?
The Role of
the Sunnah in Tackling the Problems of the Ummah
The Islamic world in general, and the Arab world
in particular, suffers many shortcomings which have contributed to the contemporary
crisis of Islamic thought. This crisis manifests itself in different forms the
most significant of which are:
Pg.34
a)
The disintegration of ties between the various sections of the Ummah;
the prevalence of the spirit of conflict in the intellectual, social and
sectarian, as well as political aspects; the revival of ideologies which divide
the Ummah or the invention of such ideologies when they do not exist.
b)
The collapse of other social and regional stabilizing factors; the
prevalence of selfish, partisan and factional attitudes, of anxiety about the
future and hopelessness concerning the present, of apathy and lack of
enthusiasm for any positive action and the predominance of altitudes based on
reaction to events —an attitude which precludes debate in favor of conflict, while
leaving the initiative to others.
c)
The lack of objective awareness of the real nature of the Ummah’s
social problems and their connection with history. The rise of the shallow,
narrow, emotional and impulsive opinions over the holistic, analytical
viewpoints; and the Muslim mind’s readiness at this time in history to accept anything,
without scrutiny or for the wrong reasons. There is also a host of other negative
phenomena which are too numerous to list in detail.
So how can we employ the Sunnah so that it will
once again help govern the Ummah’s affairs and promote the soundness of mind
and the clarity of vision necessary to produce a convincing answer to the Ummah’s problems? How can it
be used to motivate the Muslims to act and to mobilize and rally their social reserves
around the Islamic aims which will bring life and hope to the Ummah, while
inspiring the latter to seek the cultural alternative and practical social and
intellectual programme which will restore its identity and strengthen its feeling
of belonging to a deeply rooted and noble civilization and history?
The Danger of Too-Literal an Interpretation of
the Sunnah
At the time of the Prophet (SAAS), people
implemented the Sunnah in their daily life in all its aspects, and by doing so
they understood the Qur'an clearly and completely.
Pg.35
The influence of this Qur'anic miracle became
apparent in the creation of an ummatan wasatan (community of the middle
way), that is a witness and a guide to others, one endowed with perfect
goodness and the ability to meet and overcome any challenge. With the passage
of time, however, the people’s proper understanding of the Sunnah declined
whereas the dictionary-based culture began to take precedence over the other
tools of interpretation until it became, for some, the only means possible.
This gave rise to a literal approach which relied heavily on dictionary-oriented
interpretation. So much so that such dictionary-based trend did not take into
account the time-space factor, thus lending strength to the factors which
impeded the renaissance of the Ummah by contributing to the confusion, argumentation
and conflict. They also were instrumental in reducing Islam to a collection of
antiquated images, forming many of their conclusions on unlikely foundations,
and thinking that the exact circumstances which brought about a hadith could be
repeated many times-which is impossible in real life. How then can modern Sunnah
specialists deal with these matters and protect the Muslim mind from their
dangers? How can the Muslim mind be rescued from the effects of those who
nearly succeeded in emptying the Islamic message of its content and doing away
with all-embracing cultural and civilizational role? Admittedly, such people reduced Islam to no
more than an individual and behavioral matter, and restricted its vision and
frame of reference to minor, superficial concepts, and ritualistic adherence to
the letter of the religion. Such an approach is not conducive to the advent of
a truly Islamic society, the unity of the people or the building of
civilization.
The Role of the Sunnah in the Ummah’s Revival
Undoubtedly, our Ummah is today in acute need
of a comprehensive plan for renaissance which will restore it to its position
of a community of the middle way as a vanguard for humanity. This cannot be achieved
unless Muslim societies meet the necessary prerequisites, first of which is the
establishment of an intellectual and cultural blueprint for Islamic
renaissance.
The Ummah today draws on two cultures: the
inherited culture which bears the characteristics of the historical era and
environment in which it was formed, and an alien imported culture. The Muslim mind
is passive towards these two cultures-content to consume their products and
unable to make any original contribution of its own.
Pg.36
Connecting the aims and means of social change
to the Ummah’s Islamic way of life will
greatly help to mobilize the Muslim World’s energies so as to bring about the
cultural and intellectual transformation it needs, and will assist the Ummah to
shoulder this heavy burden.
To emerge from the current crisis of Islamic
thought and attain the awareness and vigor necessary for meeting contemporary
challenges and restoring the Ummah’s cultural and intellectual position of
yore, we must revisit the immutable sources of Islam, the Qur'an and the Sunnah,
and study them again in details, carefully and with a contemporary Islamic
outlook. Such an outlook needs to be clear-sighted and comprehensive enough to
take into account all the influencing factors and dimensions; it has to define
goals, explain the basic principles and devise the methods capable of meeting
pressing demands and reconstructing the constituents on which the Ummah is
founded.
The Qur'an provided our forefathers with an
excellent intellectual framework which enabled them to understand interpret and
analyze the rise of nations and the laws governing the emergence and decline of
civilizations. It helped them to examine facts in depth, in a wholly objective
fashion. It was a rational approach that consistently and indisputably dealt
with realities-as opposed to fantasies. An approach which took into account the
dynamics of history, elucidating the internal tensions in societies, how and
why they came about, how events can be interpreted, how lessons can be learnt
from them and how they can provide pointers to the future and enable appropriate
action to be taken before anticipated events should occur.
Conclusion
The Prophet’s Sunnah, his way of life as well
as that of his close Companions represent the objective, practical embodiment
of that intellectual framework. It is only when contemporary Islamic thought
addresses the Qur'an with a sound, rational frame of mind in touch with the
requirements of our time, seeking a comprehensive methodology capable of organizing
and guiding man’s life in harmony with the rest of creation, that the solution
to the great intellectual crisis will be within reach.
Pg.37
By the same token, a correct reading of the
Sunnah and of the aims of the Prophet’s implementation of the message of the
Qur’an as well as his making it a vivid reality in the lives of men, will put
an end to the darkness of ignorance, hatred, conflict and wasted energies in
our Ummah. Only so will contemporary Muslims be able to overcome their
self-inflicted disabilities, see through all the intellectual and cultural
intricacies of modern man and offer humanity true guidance and welfare based on
a correct and comprehensive understanding of Islamic teachings. Such
understanding should be able to distinguish the immutable principles from the
adaptable rules and pinpoints the aims and the means.
Pg.38
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE OUR’AN AND MODERN SCIENCE:
OBSERVATIONS ON METHODOLOGY
Dr. Imad al Din Khalil
Anyone who reads the Qur‘an carefully and
endeavors to attain a proper understanding of its attitude to science will find
out a great number of ayat which
cover science in all its aspects. They fall in four categories which correspond
to four fields of scientific knowledge. The first category deals with matters
related to the reality of science, its scope and aims, which are known as the philosophy
of science or as epistemology. The second deals with the methodology of
discovering scientific facts. The third concerns the laws that apply in the
various fields of science particularly the natural sciences. The fourth permits
those laws discovered through experimental methodology to be applied by man, in
his capacity as vicegerent of Allah (SWT) on earth, to the task of developing
and improving life. This field is known as the applied sciences.
No doubt that there is a very close relationship
between each of these categories. Philosophy of science analyses the aims of science,
while methodology provides a modus operandi for discovering facts; that is, the
sunan or cosmic patterns and laws that govern the cosmos, the world and
life, and organize their movements in time. In their turn, these laws and
systems provide man with the formulae which enable him to explore the wondrous
structure of creation. Thus, these become the means which man makes use of for
the progress and welfare of humankind means to free himself from the drudgery
of day-to-day earthly existence, and become more able to satisfy those
spiritual needs which distinguish him from all other creatures. He can thus
perform more of the duties required of him in his capacity as vicegerent, and
fulfill his role of bringing civilization and well-being to the world.
It is a truism that the Qur‘an was not revealed
as a science book or any other kind of textbook. It is equally true that some
modern thinkers insist on ascribing to its ayat certain scientific
meanings and interpretations which were never intended by their Author. In reaction,
some other thinkers have gone to the other extreme and insist that the Qur'an
has no connection whatsoever with any scientific fact.
What is undeniable, on the other hand, is that,
when the Qur'an deals with the scientific message, it applies all the four
categories mentioned in a manner that leaves no scope for discussion.
Pg.40
It is self-evident that Qur’anic and scientific
data should coincide and correspond (in their general sense, and outside the
realm of relativities and variables), and it is obvious that there should be no
contradictions or barriers between them. After all, they come from the same
source—Allah (SWT), the Originator of the universe and its cosmic laws and
systems, the Revealer of the Qur‘an, the Maker of man. Moreover, man is n concerned
party in the law-making and Qur‘an revealing process; that is, he is Allah's
vicegerent on earth, the hand that endeavors to build civilization for the sake
of Allah (SWT). The Qur‘an emphasizes the essential nature of the link between
the Qur'anic message and the cosmic laws. For how man cannot perform his role
on earth within the framework of the teachings of the Qur'an unless he begins
by trying to understand the world and find out about its laws and systems.
Here we should point out that modern science
does not reject or cast doubt on religious truth—as was the case in past
centuries. It recognizes that it does not have the last word on a subject that
is far greater than it appears to be. Having
done so, it also affirms—within its limited scope—that human life has no raison
d’etre if it is stripped of that major dimension which extends beyond the
bounds of matter and motion. Science has now returned to the situation in which
it functions in harmony with religion. This is the great revolution that has
taken place in the philosophy of science as a result of recent discoveries,
particularly in the natural and nuclear sciences, and in man’s understanding of
the way the human brain operates. In this respect research has broken—while
exploring the core of the atom —the ‘material barrier' and revealed the
spiritual dimensions underlying the structure and composition of the physical world.
Here science and religion meet—anew—in numerous instances26.
So what do we find if we take a necessarily brief look at the relationship
between the four aspects of science and the data contained in the Qur‘an27?
I)
The Philosophy of Science, Its Aims, and
Islam’s Basic Principles
The philosophy of science is concerned with
examining and analyzing the objectives science aims to achieve and their
relationship firstly with man’s civilizational endeavors, and secondly with
man’s vision of the cosmos, life and the world in which he lives.
Pg.41
It would appear that scientific research and
the experimental methodology it adopts are necessities of Islamic life, not
luxuries or secondary factors. This is because they are intimately linked to
the activities of the Ummah, the nature of its mission on earth and its overall
beliefs about the cosmos, life, the world and man.
Here, it would perhaps be useful to mention
some basic principles of the Islamic life and world-view which dictate the use
of scientific methodologies, of the laws and systems uncovered by established scientific
truths and of the ways in which they are applied. Such an approach plays an
important role in strengthening these principles, asserting the fundamental
elements of the global Islamic world-view, linking them more practically to the
real world and enabling them to make an active contribution to civilization.
There are, in our opinion, four basic principles calling for scientific
activity:
1) Istikhlaf or Khilafah28
Man’s carrying of the Divine trust (amanah)
constitutes his khilafah or vicegerency to God on earth. The principle
of khilafah put forward in the Qur‘anand the Sunnah is one of those
principles which science upholds and enables to become a reality.
The Muslim is Allah’s vicegerent on earth so
that he can develop it, bring civilization to it, meet its challenges, and
create the conditions for a want-free, secure life which is more conducive to
higher achievements — that is, aspiring towards the Creator.
Man cannot carry out his functions as
vicegerent, or obtain sufficient guarantees and assistance to enable him to
achieve his objectives of uninterrupted progress, unless he uses scientific
research methodologies in order to discover the cosmic sunan mentioned
earlier. Only then can he ‘plug in' to their reserves of energy and achieve a
greater harmony between himself and his environment. Without this, the
principle of khilafah is no more than a theory or dogma operating in a
vacuum.
2) Tawazun (balance):
Tawazun or balance between man’s spiritual and
material needs is one of the basic principles of Islamic life and thought. It
is an issue that is deeply ingrained in the Qur‘an and the Sunnah, where we find
that it takes on a number of aspects and forms.
Pg.42
We have long ignored one of the most obviously
self-evident facts in this area, namely that Allah (SWT) has subjected the
earth to man in a manner compatible with his role in it. It is a blatant
contradiction—totally rejected by Islam—that although Allah (SWT) created man
in a particular form and has subjected the earth to him in order for him to
satisfy the requirements of his make- up, other heavenly religions proclaim the
separation between the spiritual and the material. In so doing, they deviate
towards the former, with the result that barriers are erected between the
demands of man’s make-up and the fruits and benefits of the earth that has been
subjected to him.
The fact is that there can be no Islamic life
as such without a proper balance between the two sides of man’s make-up.
However, Islam’s objective is to operate within the realm of the real and
create a balanced human being capable of action, change and motion; free from
tension, deviation or repression. Yet, this balanced vision—which no other
school or religion in the world accepts with the same degree of universality
and commitment —cannot be implemented in the absence of scientific
methodologies, facts and applications.
3) Taskhir (subservience):
This is another basic characteristic of the
Islamic vision of the cosmos and life. Here, too, without a shadow of doubt,
science is needed before this vision can become reality and realize its noble
potential. According to the Islamic view, nature and the universe have been
made subservient to man. Allah (SWT) has laid down their laws, systems and
capacities in a manner befitting the basic function of man as vicegerent on
earth and in accordance with, his ability to interact positively and
effectively with nature.
In connection with this interaction, Islam aims
is to propose a ‘middle way' methodology. It informs mankind of the principle
that nature is subject to the service of human ends. At the same time, however,
it lays down the parameters of interaction between the two sides of man’s make-up
through the establishment of values, principles and conventions. These are
designed to produce the greatest possible degree of innovation and to instill
such civilizational qualities as are most compatible with man’s ambitions,
ethics and status in the cosmos.
Pg.43
If it fails to make use of science’s
potential-that is, the methodologies, facts and applications of science — no
Islamic society can be ever implement the principle of taskhir and
transform it into a historical reality.
4) The Necessary Link Between
Creation and the Creator
Finally, science must be sued to establish one
of the most important principles of the Islamic world-view in particular and
that of religion in general. This is the necessary link between the wondrous
system of creation and the existence of the Creator. Science is the tool that
reveals and clarifies this link. Many have written about the miracle of
creation and many scientists and scholars have spent their lives seeking to
arrive at one of the main incontestable truths in the history of science: that
is, that creation must have a Creator. This issue has been decisively resolved
and there is no scope left for questioning. Since the cosmos is governed in its
functioning by organization, precision, harmonious motion and constructive
inter-linkage – all resolved by mathematical calculation and scientific
formulae, by numerous proofs and by the results of countless scientific
experiments, it must originate from a supernatural, all-powerful and directing
Will.
Scientific research, therefore, is a necessity
of Islamic life as long as it continues to perform the critical function of
exploring the secrets of the cosmos, the world and life. Moreover, it leads to
the Maker of the universe in the most convincing manner and – as it turns to
the Creator – it coincides with the act of worship itself.
II)
The Methodology
In this context the Quran expounds a
methodology for the discovery of the laws of the universe. It is flexible,
comprehensive methodology that is not subject to the fluctuations of time and
space since it is strictly a method or a tool for research and exploration. It
thus transcends relative changes and remains valid in every age and every
environment. The Quran exhorts people to have an insight into the reality of
their existence and their place in the cosmos. To do this, they are invited to
use their senses so as to observe their surroundings from the ground on which
they stand to the horizons of the psyche and the cosmos: what a good attitude
for man to the higher spheres of iman29! The Quran also
assigns the senses a basic responsibility for every step taken by the Muslim in
the fields of research, contemplation, knowledge and experience.
Pg.44
The Qur’an went a step further telling man to
make use of all his senses to receive unlimited data so that his perceptive
power can register, discriminate, accept or reject them with a view to reaching
the Truth which underlies the unity of the laws of the cosmos.
The intellect and the senses are all jointly
responsible for exploration, examination, inductive reasoning and
decision-making. Man will be put to the test on the basis of this responsibility,
because he is essentially different from other living creatures. There are
numerous ayat in the Qur‘an which stress time and again that it is the
hearing, the sight and the feeling-in-the-heart (al fu’ad) that jointly
give human life its value and its uniqueness. If man activates these powers
extensively and makes full use of them, he will reach the peak of his
scientific and religious superiority; such elevation will make him master of the
universe, thus deserving his status as vicegerent of Allah (SWT) on earth. On
the other hand, if he deactivates these powers, he will have chosen the meanest
status for himself-an inferior status that Allah (SWT) did not predestine for
him when He endowed him with hearing, sight and the feeling- in-the-heart.
There are also about fifty other ayat
which urge man to activate his intellect. The intellect is Allah-given key for
man to penetrate the realm of faith in Him. Further ayat invite man to
ponder deeply, perceptively and responsibly upon all the phenomena in the world
around him.
Whatever is said about contemplation also
applies to acquiring knowledge which is an intellectual step beyond
contemplation and the outcome of it. Acquiring knowledge gives man a greater awareness
of his surroundings and a deeper perception of the dimensions of his being and
relationship with the cosmos. It opens up his perceptions at all times and ensures
his readiness to tackle, in a responsible manner, every issue, phenomenon or
problem that presents itself to him.
The Qur’an stresses the methods to be
followed—proof, argument, intelligent debate—in order for man to arrive at
valid results founded on induction, comparison, balance and examination, and
supported by the basis of agreed external data as well as the strength of the intellectual
and logical powers of those people who have greater competence in this field.
Pg.45
It is highly significant that the Qur‘an uses
the word ‘ilm (knowledge/science) to indicate (a) the din30
that Allah (SWT) taught to His prophets, (b) the sunan with which Allah
(SWT) enables the universe to function harmoniously, and (c) the great truths
which are contained in its ayat. 'Ilm also occurs as an indication
of the revealed religious values.
Thus ‘ilm and din acquire identical
connotations in Qur'anic language. The words of Allah (SWT) teach us this fact
and enable us to perceive the broad, inter-linked senses which He wishes ‘ilm
and din to convey rather than the meanings derived from the uninformed opinions
and prejudices of the positivists. The various declensions and derivatives of
the word ‘ilm occur in more than 750 ayat.
The Qur’an stresses that a completely
scientific approach must be adopted in studying the physical and metaphysical
phenomena, and declares its categorical rejection of everything that has a
negative effect on such an approach: prejudices, uninformed opinions, magic and
superstition. Such unscientific practices are all forms of deviation from the
true way which the din requires man to follow, along the straight path,
in order to reach his goals. As we are know, straight path is the shortest
distance between two points; thus any deviation from it will increase the
distance and hardship, and could deflect travelers to the extent that they may
never reach their goals. The Qur’an repeatedly asserts a clear and obvious
fact, namely that nothing can come of prejudice but worthlessness and blindness,
and that the only alternative to truth is error.
III)
Facts
The third dimension offered by the Qur‘an
consists of a mass of facts, and systems in the various fields of science:
astronomy, geography, botany, biology, human physiology. . . In this respect,
many modern thinkers—or exegetes— adopt one of two conflicting positions. The
first position relies entirely on the use of modern scientific data to interpret
the Qur'an’s ayat, with the resulting methodological errors whereby
partial data is applied to produce a general
ruling, variable data is used to produce an invariable ruling and relative data
is used to produce an absolute ruling. The weakness of this approach is that,
if these partial and relative scientific data should change—and this, as the
scientists themselves will confirm, is their natural propensity—then the
proponent of this position would suffer a form of mental anguish.
Pg.46
While attempting to avoid such a fate, the
second position also falls into the trap of erroneous thinking by totally
rejecting scientific data.
The nearest attitude to a sound methodology is
a middle position which the Qur'an teaches us to adopt in every area of life.
We should not allow ourselves to become fully committed to science with its
variable data; yet at the same time we should not totally reject every
interpretation in which science plays a part.
A capable contemporary exegete of the Qur‘an
must be able to use his intellect and experience in his own field of
specialization in order to understand the nature of the relationship between
the two sides of the equation: the Qur'anic ayah and the scientific thesis.
In addition, he must make use of certain modern trends in Qur'anic
interpretation that have recently been developed. These trends use Qur'anic
terminology and imagery to understand its meaning and content—an approach known
as al tafsir ul bayani li al Qur’an. This method contains objective
guarantees, which protect the interpreter from exaggeration or error in his attempts
to obtain the intended meanings of words and phrases. This balance between
scientific specialization and al tafsir al bayani enables the exegete to
strive towards revealing the intended meanings of the scientific ayat
in the Qur’an.
There are some scientific facts that have
become definitive laws or indisputable, self-evident truths; for example, the
role of the winds in producing rain, the role of gravity in the movements of
the solar system, the anatomical stages of the foetus, or changes in the ratios
of gaseous substances as their distance from the earth's surface increases or
decreases. Apart from these, there are also many other facts the scientific
nature of which the Arabs were not familiar with at the time of the revelation
of the Qur‘an. Interpretation of the Qur'anic ayat which deal with and
confirm these facts has relied—at least in recent centuries on self-evident
scientific facts and, in doing so, has revealed one of the Qur‘an’s many miraculous
aspects.
There are scientific facts that convey more
than one aspect of reality. However, all these aspects exist within a single,
flexible framework and it is sometimes useful to cross-reference them to other
Qur’anic ayat in order to understand their significance in relation, for
example, to other ayat which confirm that the miraculous structure of
the heavens is held together and protected from disintegration by a system.
Pg.47
However, theories which are still at the
discussion and evaluation stages and—unlike the ‘proven' laws and self-evident
truths-have not yet been established, and should, therefore, be treated with great
caution and not be applied by the exegete to throw light on any aspect of a
given ayah.
Where constantly-changing scientific data is
concerned, it is essential to proceed with care and avoid the possible errors
of (a) a complete commitment to, and (b) a complete rejection of the scientific
interpretation. A complete commitment to the scientific interpretation will
impair proper understanding, awareness, and further investigation at all
levels. On the other hand, complete rejection will undermine the ability to
understand and erect barriers between modern man and an aspect of the
information contained in the Qur’an.
Scientific-oriented data—devised as proofs to
lead man to attain belief in Allah (SWT) —are to be found in abundance
throughout the Qur‘an. Here it is worth noting that not everything propounded
by the Qur‘an on a scientific topic is intended to be a miracle for the coming
generations. Nor was it necessarily unknown at the time of revelation. There
are two types of ayat: One type conveys information and directs attention
to the excellence of Allah's creation—the cosmos, the world and life. This type
presents facts and phenomena that were as well-known at the time of revelation
as they have been in every other age. The other type consists of pointers to
scientific facts, systems and sunan not known at the time of revelation,
but which science has revealed over the ages. This is the type that is usually
called the scientific miracle and wondrous nature of the Qur'an.
One should also note that the Qur'an does not
contain all scientific facts since it is not a science text-book. However, it
reveals some facts and provide pointers to a host of others. It creates a
psychological climate for researchers, thus leaving man the man freedom to discover
a far greater mass of facts for himself. But the Qur’an does underline that man
can only follow these discoveries through religious faith and commitment.
IV)
Application
When considering the fourth aspect of the
relation between the Qur’an and science, one observes that the Qur’an
frequently urges man to make use of scientific facts and discoveries in order
to improve life and raise the quality of human civilization at every level.
Pg.48
This is a broad, flexible and constant position
which calls on man to benefit from the scientific data available everywhere in
time and space, and apply them to the civilization of the age in which he
lives. If this happens, and if there are developments in the known scientific
facts and the state of civilization, then the Qur’an can be seen to appeal effectively
to every generation and inspire it to bring about further changes on the basis
of new facts and new situations.
Thus, however one looks at this fourth
dimension of the relationship between the Qur’an and science, one finds that
the Qur’an constantly—and unconditionally—calls upon the community of believers
to make more and more good use of scientific facts, discoveries and formulae.
Does the Qur’an not call upon the Muslims to make ready for their enemies the
strength with which they can strike terror into them with a view to defending
their lives and protecting their role on earth? And docs this call not reflects
a broad, flexible attitude that can be applied in every time and place,
combining immediacy with universality and the temporary with the permanent?
وَأَعِدُّواْ لَهُم مَّا ٱسۡتَطَعۡتُم مِّن
قُوَّةٍ۬ وَمِن رِّبَاطِ ٱلۡخَيۡلِ تُرۡهِبُونَ بِهِۦ عَدُوَّ ٱللَّهِ
وَعَدُوَّڪُمۡ وَءَاخَرِينَ مِن دُونِهِمۡ لَا تَعۡلَمُونَهُمُ ٱللَّهُ
يَعۡلَمُهُمۡۚ وَمَا تُنفِقُواْ مِن شَىۡءٍ۬ فِى سَبِيلِ ٱللَّهِ يُوَفَّ
إِلَيۡكُمۡ وَأَنتُمۡ لَا تُظۡلَمُونَ (٦٠) سُوۡرَةُ الاٴنفَال
Against them make ready your strength to the
utmost of you power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into [the hearts
of] the enemies of Allah and your enemies (8:60).
Reference is made in this ayah to absolute
strength and steeds of war being the best weaponry at that time.
The Qur’anic chapter “The Iron" also
stresses the need to make use of this mineral which is so crucial in the arenas
of both peace and war, specifying, however, how it should be used or processed:
-
لَقَدۡ أَرۡسَلۡنَا رُسُلَنَا بِٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ
وَأَنزَلۡنَا مَعَهُمُ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ وَٱلۡمِيزَانَ لِيَقُومَ ٱلنَّاسُ بِٱلۡقِسۡطِۖ
وَأَنزَلۡنَا ٱلۡحَدِيدَ فِيهِ بَأۡسٌ۬ شَدِيدٌ۬ وَمَنَـٰفِعُ لِلنَّاسِ
وَلِيَعۡلَمَ ٱللَّهُ مَن يَنصُرُهُ ۥ وَرُسُلَهُ ۥ بِٱلۡغَيۡبِۚ إِنَّ
ٱللَّهَ قَوِىٌّ عَزِيزٌ۬ (٢٥) سُوۡرَةُ الحَدید
We sent aforetime our messengers with Clear
Signs and sent down with them the Book and the Balance [of Right and Wrong],
that men may stand forth in justice. And We sent down Iron, In which is [material
for] mighty war, as well as many benefits for mankind. That Allah may test who
it is that will help, unseen, Him and His messengers. For Allah is full of
Strength, Exalted in Might (57:25).
Pg.49
Could there be any greater proof of the
Muslim‘s link with the earth than the naming of a whole surah after one
of its most important and crucial minerals? What could be a more convincing
indication of approval than the above ayah for applying science and
technology, and developing the creative and civilizing tendencies that Islam
makes an essential component of the behavior and ethics derived from faith,
which a scientist must possess in his heart? Furthermore, this ayah presents
iron as a great blessing bestowed by Allah (SWT) on His servants. Yet at the
same time it points to the two possible applications of iron: “material for
mighty war” (when iron is used for making arms and military preparations), and “benefits”
(which man can derive from this mineral in every area of his peaceful, constructive
activities). What further need can there be to stress the growing importance of
iron over the ages in matters of both peace and war? In our own age it has become
one of the most important instruments for welfare or destructive purposes at
the service of man. A modern power which possesses iron can indeed strike
terror into its enemies, because of the heavy weaponry potential iron gives it.
At the same time, it can join the ranks of the major industrialized countries
for whom iron is the backbone of industry and wealth.
While dealing with iron, and as we have just
come across a whole Surah named after it, let us remember the ayah from Surah Saba’, which mention Allah’s blessing upon
prophet Da’ud (AS) when He taught him how to soften iron. This was in the context
of civilizational endeavor. Dhul-Qarnain is another example: addressing the oppressed
and seeking to protect them from a forthcoming invasion, he said:
قَالَ مَا مَكَّنِّى فِيهِ رَبِّى خَيۡرٌ۬
فَأَعِينُونِى بِقُوَّةٍ أَجۡعَلۡ بَيۡنَكُمۡ وَبَيۡنَہُمۡ رَدۡمًا (٩٥) ءَاتُونِى
زُبَرَ ٱلۡحَدِيدِۖ حَتَّىٰٓ إِذَا سَاوَىٰ بَيۡنَ ٱلصَّدَفَيۡنِ قَالَ ٱنفُخُواْۖ
حَتَّىٰٓ إِذَا جَعَلَهُ ۥ نَارً۬ا قَالَ ءَاتُونِىٓ أُفۡرِغۡ عَلَيۡهِ
قِطۡرً۬ا (٩٦) فَمَا ٱسۡطَـٰعُوٓاْ أَن يَظۡهَرُوهُ وَمَا ٱسۡتَطَـٰعُواْ
لَهُ ۥ نَقۡبً۬ا (٩٧) سُوۡرَةُ الکهف
“[The power] in which my
Lord had established me is better [than tribute]: help me therefore with
strength [and labor]: I will erect a stronger barrier between you and them:
Bring me blocks of iron". At length, when he had filled up the space between
the two steep mountain-sides, he said: “Blow [with your bellows]”. Then, when
he had made it [red] as fire, he said: “Bring me, that I may pour over it,
molten copper", Thus were they made powerless to scale it or to dig through
it (18: 95-97).
The Qur’an draws a unique picture of the
harmony between man, nature and the supernatural. It portrays the balance
between the subjection—and conversion—of material forces to the service of man and
the worship of Allah (SWT).
Pg.50
It shows the extraordinary contrast between the
aesthetic, and practical aspects of nature. It also shows a clear counterpoise
between man’s strength and practical potential on the one hand, and his
position in relation to the rest of existence, his weakness and his perpetual
need for Allah (SWT) on the other. There is it constant Qur’anic reminder of
the need to guard man’s capability from the tendency to stray from the
fulfillment of his material and natural needs:
۞ وَلَقَدۡ ءَاتَيۡنَا دَاوُ ۥدَ مِنَّا فَضۡلاً۬ۖ
يَـٰجِبَالُ أَوِّبِى مَعَهُ ۥ وَٱلطَّيۡرَۖ وَأَلَنَّا لَهُ ٱلۡحَدِيدَ (١٠) أَنِ
ٱعۡمَلۡ سَـٰبِغَـٰتٍ۬ وَقَدِّرۡ فِى ٱلسَّرۡدِۖ وَٱعۡمَلُواْ صَـٰلِحًاۖ إِنِّى
بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ بَصِيرٌ۬ (١١) وَلِسُلَيۡمَـٰنَ ٱلرِّيحَ غُدُوُّهَا
شَہۡرٌ۬ وَرَوَاحُهَا شَہۡرٌ۬ۖ وَأَسَلۡنَا لَهُ ۥ عَيۡنَ ٱلۡقِطۡرِۖ وَمِنَ
ٱلۡجِنِّ مَن يَعۡمَلُ بَيۡنَ يَدَيۡهِ بِإِذۡنِ رَبِّهِۖۦ وَمَن يَزِغۡ مِنۡہُمۡ
عَنۡ أَمۡرِنَا نُذِقۡهُ مِنۡ عَذَابِ ٱلسَّعِيرِ (١٢) يَعۡمَلُونَ
لَهُ ۥ مَا يَشَآءُ مِن مَّحَـٰرِيبَ وَتَمَـٰثِيلَ وَجِفَانٍ۬ كَٱلۡجَوَابِ
وَقُدُورٍ۬ رَّاسِيَـٰتٍۚ ٱعۡمَلُوٓاْ ءَالَ دَاوُ ۥدَ شُكۡرً۬اۚ وَقَلِيلٌ۬
مِّنۡ عِبَادِىَ ٱلشَّكُورُ (١٣) فَلَمَّا قَضَيۡنَا عَلَيۡهِ ٱلۡمَوۡتَ
مَا دَلَّهُمۡ عَلَىٰ مَوۡتِهِۦۤ إِلَّا دَآبَّةُ ٱلۡأَرۡضِ تَأۡڪُلُ
مِنسَأَتَهُۖ ۥ فَلَمَّا خَرَّ تَبَيَّنَتِ ٱلۡجِنُّ أَن لَّوۡ كَانُواْ
يَعۡلَمُونَ ٱلۡغَيۡبَ مَا لَبِثُواْ فِى ٱلۡعَذَابِ ٱلۡمُهِينِ (١٤) سُوۡرَةُ سَبَإ
We bestowed Grace aforetime on Da’ud from
Ourselves: “O you Mountains! Sing you back the praises of Allah with him! And
you birds [also]!”» And We made the iron soft for him, [commanding], “Make you
coats of mail, balancing well the rings of chain armour, and work you
righteousness; for be sure I see [clearly] all that you do." And to Sulaiman
We made the wind [obedient]; Its early morning [stride] was a month’s
[journey], and its evening [stride] was a month's [journey]; and We made a font
of molten brass to flow for him; and there were Jinns that worked in front of
him, by the leave of his Lord, and if any of them turned aside from Our command,
We made him taste of the penalty of the blazing fire. They worked for him as he
desired, [making] arches, mages, business as large as reservoirs, and [cooking]
cauldron fixed [in their places]: “Work
you, Sons of Da'ud, with thanks! But few of My servants are grateful!"
Then, when We decreed [Sulaiman‘s] death, nothing showed them his death except
a little worm of the earth, which kept [slowly] gnawing away at his staff: So
when he fell down, the Jinns saw plainly that if they had known the
Unseen, they would not have tarried in the humiliating Penalty [of their task] (34:
10-14)
In another surah one reads:
قَالَ رَبِّ ٱغۡفِرۡ لِى وَهَبۡ لِى مُلۡكً۬ا
لَّا يَنۢبَغِى لِأَحَدٍ۬ مِّنۢ بَعۡدِىٓۖ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ ٱلۡوَهَّابُ (٣٥) فَسَخَّرۡنَا
لَهُ ٱلرِّيحَ تَجۡرِى بِأَمۡرِهِۦ رُخَآءً حَيۡثُ أَصَابَ (٣٦) وَٱلشَّيَـٰطِينَ
كُلَّ بَنَّآءٍ۬ وَغَوَّاصٍ۬ (٣٧) وَءَاخَرِينَ مُقَرَّنِينَ فِى ٱلۡأَصۡفَادِ
(٣٨) هَـٰذَا عَطَآؤُنَا فَٱمۡنُنۡ أَوۡ أَمۡسِكۡ بِغَيۡرِ حِسَابٍ۬ (٣٩) سُوۡرَةُ صٓ
He said: “O my Lord! Forgive me and grant me a
Kingdom which, [it may be], suits not another after me: For You are the Grantor
of Bounties [without measure]”. Then We subjected the wind to his power, to
flow gently to his order, Whithersoever he willed, —as also the evil ones,
[including] every kind of builder and diver—, as also others bound together in
fetters. “Such are Our Bounties: Whether you bestow them [on others] or
withhold them, no account will be asked" (38: 35-39).
Pg.51
The Qur‘an goes on to state:
فَفَهَّمۡنَـٰهَا سُلَيۡمَـٰنَۚ وَڪُلاًّ
ءَاتَيۡنَا حُكۡمً۬ا وَعِلۡمً۬اۚ وَسَخَّرۡنَا مَعَ دَاوُ ۥدَ ٱلۡجِبَالَ
يُسَبِّحۡنَ وَٱلطَّيۡرَۚ وَڪُنَّا فَـٰعِلِينَ (٧٩) وَعَلَّمۡنَـٰهُ
صَنۡعَةَ لَبُوسٍ۬ لَّڪُمۡ لِتُحۡصِنَكُم مِّنۢ بَأۡسِكُمۡۖ فَهَلۡ أَنتُمۡ
شَـٰكِرُونَ (٨٠) وَلِسُلَيۡمَـٰنَ ٱلرِّيحَ عَاصِفَةً۬ تَجۡرِى
بِأَمۡرِهِۦۤ إِلَى ٱلۡأَرۡضِ ٱلَّتِى بَـٰرَكۡنَا فِيہَاۚ وَڪُنَّا بِكُلِّ
شَىۡءٍ عَـٰلِمِينَ (٨١) وَمِنَ ٱلشَّيَـٰطِينِ مَن يَغُوصُونَ لَهُ ۥ
وَيَعۡمَلُونَ عَمَلاً۬ دُونَ ذَٲلِكَۖ وَكُنَّا لَهُمۡ حَـٰفِظِينَ (٨٢) سُوۡرَةُ الاٴنبیَاء
To each We gave Judgment and Knowledge; it was
Our power that made the hills and the birds celebrate Our praises with Da’ud.
It was We Who did [all these things]. It was We Who taught him the making of
coats of mail for your benefit, to guard you from each other's violence. Will
you then be grateful? [It was Our power that made] the violent, [unruly] Wind flow
[tamely] for Sulaiman, to his order, to the land which We had blessed; for We
do know all things. And of the evil ones were some who dived for him, and did
other work besides; and it was We Who guarded them (21: 79-82)
These ayat are but a few among many
examples which demonstrate the supreme civilizational integration between man,
nature and the powers of the Unseen, as they interact creatively in response to
Allah’s will. Here the cosmic energies operate in ordained harmony for the
service of man who turns to Allah (SWT) in all his actions in worship, praise
and gratitude for all these bounties so that he deserves the status for the
sake of which life on earth was brought into existence:
وَمَا خَلَقۡتُ ٱلۡجِنَّ وَٱلۡإِنسَ إِلَّا
لِيَعۡبُدُونِ (٥٦) مَآ أُرِيدُ مِنۡہُم مِّن رِّزۡقٍ۬ وَمَآ أُرِيدُ أَن
يُطۡعِمُونِ (٥٧) سُوۡرَةُ الذّاریَات
I have only created Jinn and men, that they may
serve Me. No Sustenance do I require of them, nor do I require that they should
feed Me (51: 56-57).
Here we meet two of the chosen servants of
Allah—prophets Da’ud and Sulaiman. The vast powers of nature were made
subservient to them as were the energies of the Unseen which no time limit or
place-barrier can confine, and before which science ultimately shows impotence.
All these powers-iron, the wind, molten brass, the jinn—were made subservient
so that they can function at the command of the responsible, God-conscious man
and help him fulfil his civilizational purpose by developing industry and the
arts. We can see in these Qur'anic stories clear references to iron and brass that
are manifestly applicable to us today, in the twentieth century, and are vital
for modern civilization, or indeed any civilization wishing to build,
industrialize and excel in everything. We can also see that Allah (SWT) did not
merely give prophet Da’ud iron; He also taught him how to soften it and make
its use possible. Moreover, one should not forget the reference to the wind which
geographical research has shown to be a crucial factor in developing and
destroying life on earth.
Pg.52
These ayat—among many others-provide us
with a decisive answer to those who allege that the only function of the Divine
religions is to lead their followers into a state of isolation and passivity,
and persuade them that the world is an archway to be merely passed through
rather than developed. For these people religion is ‘the antithesis of
civilization’ and faith is ‘an obstacle to creativity, invention and
innovation‘; they contend that the relationship between man and his Creator
(SWT) leads to inertia, and claim that only the positivist schools have a
dynamic role in developing and improving life. This concept is totally
unacceptable.
In this study, but few of the hundreds of
examples were given which prove that the Qur’an totally rejects defeatism and
passivity, a behavior conducive to making religion and progress implacable enemies.
Indeed, to be God-conscious does not mean to withdraw from the usual processes
of life, nor to perform deeds which are utterly devoid of utilitarian value. The
whole matter of religion from the Islamic point of view is to enhance the very
quality of the practices of living. On this account, Islam remains embedded in the
very processes of life and history.
Pg.53
Notes
1. Subhanahu wa Ta‘ala: May He be praised and may His transcendence
be affirmed. Said when referring to Allah.
2. Salla Allahu Alayhi was Sallam : May
the peace and blessings of Allah (SWT) be upon him; said whenever the name of
the Prophet Muhammad is mentioned, or whenever he is referred to as the Prophet
of Allah (SWT).
3. ‘Alayhi al Salam or ‘Alayhim
al Salam: Upon him/them be the blessings of Allah (SWI`). Said whenever a
prophet other than Muhammad (SAAS) is mentioned by name.
4. Ayah (pl. Ayat):
A verse from the Qur’an; a phenomenon pointing to the Creator.
5. Faqih (pl. fuqaha’): A specialist in fiqh
(see note 8). Also can be a synonym for ‘alim (pl. ulama')
meaning Islamic scholar.
6. Al nasikh (Abrogating): Those verses of the Qur’an whose
contents have revoked a meaning in another verse, which is therefore called al
mansukh (abrogated).
7. Ben ‘Ashur, Shaikh Muhammad
al Tahar, Tafsir al Tatahrir wa al Tanwir, al Dar al Tunisiyyah, Tunis,
1984, pp 28-29.
8. Fiqh: Knowledge of Islam through its laws; science
of the law of Islam. Usul al Fiqh: Science of Islamic jurisprudence, or the
methodology of deriving laws from the sources of Islamic laws and of
establishing their juristic or constitutional validity.
9. Hadith (pl. ahadith): The verbalized form at
tradition of the Prophet (SAAS) constitutive of his Sunnah. Also a collective term
for all the ahadith. With capital H it applies to the sciences dealing
with the Prophet‘s tradition in all its aspects. The scholars of hadith are
called muhaddithun.
10.
Ben ‘Ashur, op. cit, p. 12.
11.
Usuliyun:
Derogatorily rendered as “fundamentalists” and wrongly as “puritans”, the
correct word is “purists” as it refers to those who insist on adhering to the
traditional interpretations of the Qur‘an and the Sunnah and thus are not prone
to engage in ijtihad (see note 16).
Pg.54
12.
Ben ‘Ashur, op. cit, p. 44.
13.
Tawhid: Unization of
God-the act of affirming that Allah (SWT) is the One, the absolute,
transcendent Creator, the Lord and Master of all that is. Tawhid is the
essence of Islam.
14.
Sunnah: The path and example of the Prophet (SAAS),
consisting of all that he said, did, approved of or condemned.
15.
“Methods of Understanding
the Qur’an", IIIT, Herndon, Virginia, 1991.
16.
Ijtihad: Considering
that the accepted juridical sources of Islam are valid for all times and
places, ijtihad may be described as a creative but disciplined
intellectual effort to derive legal rulings from those sources while taking
into consideration the variables imposed by the fluctuating circumstances of
Muslim society.
17.
Imam (pl. a'immah): Community leader in religious as well as
in lay matters deriving his legitimacy from commitment to and knowledge of
Islam. Also interpreter of Islamic law.
18.
Muhaddithun : See
note 9.
19.
Sunan: (pl. Asanid):
Chain of reporters who transmitted a specific hadith or tradition. Al Musnad:
Any collection of ahadith in which they are arranged according to the
reporters who related them—e.g. Musnad Abu Dawud.
20.
Mujtahidun: See note
16.
21.
Ahad: Those
ahadith based on the testimony of one narrator only.
22.
Fatwah (pl. Fatawa):
A juristic opinion given by a a’lim, mufti, or mujtahid on any
matter pertinent to Islamic law.
23.
Published by Dar al Shuruq
in Cairo and Beirut.
24.
Sirah: Biography of the
Prophet (SAAS).
25.
Within its policy of
directing research on the Sunnah towards a correct understanding of it, the
Institute held an international seminar in cooperation with the Royal Society
for the Study of Islamic Civilization, based in Amman. The Prophet’s Sunnah:
Its Methods for Building Knowledge and Civilization, was held in November
1989 during the seventh General Conference of the Society and was attended by
126 scholars, professors and researchers. Among the most important items
discussed in the seminar were Shaikh al Ghazali‘s and Dr al Qaradawi's two published
books on the Sunnah (earlier mentioned) as well as other papers written for the
seminar.
Pg.55
26.
These issues were discussed
in my book Al 'Ilm Fi Muwajihad al Maddiyah (Science Face to Face with
Materialism), Beirut, Mu’assasat al Risalah, 1986.
27.
For further details, refer
to my book Madkhal ila Mawfiq' al Qur’an al Karim min al 'Ilm
(Introduction to the Qur‘an’s Attitude Towards Science), Beirut, Mu'assasat al
Risalah, 1983. Here the reader will also find full Qur'anic textual evidence-subject
by subject.
28.
Khilafah: The institution of man as vicegerent of Allah
(SWT); the institution of government as continuation of the worldly government
of the Prophet (SAAS). Khlifah (pl. Khulafah'): Vicegerent of
Allah (SWT) in space-time.
29.
Iman: The conviction,
or certainty, that Allah (SWT) is indeed the One and only God and that Muhammad
is His last Prophet.
30.
Din: The
normative or perfect religion which Allah (SWT) ordained for mankind and which
includes faith, ethics, law, devotion, institutions and judgment.
Pg.56
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Dr. Taha Jabir al ‘Alwani
Dr. Taha Jabir al ‘Alwani was born in Iraq in 1354 /1935. He received
his primary and secondary education in his native land and then graduated with an
Honours Degree from the College of Shari’ah and Law at Al Azhar University in
Cairo in 1378/1959. From the same university he was awarded his Master`s Degree
in 1388/1968, and a Doctorate in Usul al Fiqh in 1392/1973.
For ten years (from 1395/1975 to 1405/1985) Dr
al ‘Alwani was a Professor of Fiqh and Usul al Fiqh at Imam
Muhammad ibn Saud University in Riyadh. Dr al ‘Alwani participated in the
founding of the International Institute of Islamic Thought in the USA in
1401/1981 and is now the Institute's
President and a member of its Board of Trustees.
He is a founder-member of the Council of the
Muslim World League in Makkah; a member of the OIC Islamic Fiqh Academy in
Jeddah since 1407/1987; President of the Fiqh Council of North America since
1408/1988.
Among his works on Islamic Jurisprudence are:
His edition of Al Mahsul Fi Ilm Usul Al Fiqh
[The Sum and Substance of Usul al Fiqh] by al Imam Fakhr al Din al Razi,
in six volumes.
Al Ijtihad wa al Taqlid fi al Islam [Legal Reasoning and Imitation in lsIam].
Huquq al Multaham fi al Islam [Rights of the Accused in Islam].
Adab al Ikhtilaf fi al Islam [The Ethics of
Disagreement in Islam].
Usul Al
Fiqh Al Islami :
Source Methodology in Islamic Jurisprudence. (Also in French)
Dr ‘Imad al Din Khalil
Dr 'Imad
al Din Khalil was born in Mosul, Iraq, in 1939. He undertook primary and
secondary education locally and obtained his B.A. in 1962 and his M.A. in 1965
in Islamic History from the University of Baghdad. He then started a doctoral
research at the University of ‘Ain Shams, Egypt, and in 1968 obtained a Ph.D.
with distinction in Islamic History. He was also a director of the University
of Mosul Central Library (1966-1967), and was appointed in 1967 as lecturer at
this University where he taught, until 1977, Islamic History, Research Methodology,
and the Philosophy of History.
Pg.57
Between 1977 - 1987 he served as Chairman of
the Department of Antiquities, Director of the Cultural Museum Library, and a
Senior Research Fellow al the General Directorate of Museums and Antiquities. He
is currently a Professor of Islamic History at the University of Salahuddin, Arbil,
lraq.
Professor Khalil has also lectured at various
Arab universities and institutions, and has made a contribution to the works
produced by the Islamic, Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(ISESCO). He has also participated in several international conferences, among
them: The First International Conference on University Education (Baghdad,
l97l); The Third International Conference on Sirah and Sunnah (Qatar, 1979). He
has published more than fifty books in Islamic thought, methodology and history
as well as literature and literary criticism.
Pg.58
No comments:
Post a Comment